BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Inequality: A fundamental doubt

Expert replies
by Uri » Tue Apr 07, 2009 7:33 am
Image

I simplified the question as:
(x - y) > (x + y)
i.e., I need to know whether y < 0.
This information is provided in (2). But (B) is not the answer.

Can you please tell me where I have made the mistake? Have I overlooked some rule in of inequality while simplifying?

OA: [spoiler](E)[/spoiler]
Last edited by Uri on Tue Apr 07, 2009 11:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by mike22629 » Tue Apr 07, 2009 8:01 am
Not positive, but this is what I think.

Obviously we agree A is inefficient.

With B,

If x = -4 and y = -1, then x + y = -5, thus you are multiplying both sides of equation by a negative number and must change the direction of the sign.

Thus,

x-y < x + y

Someone correct me if I am wrong plz.
Join the discussion

Re: Inequality: A fundamental doubt

by sacx » Tue Apr 07, 2009 8:49 am
Uri wrote:Image

I simplified the question as:
(x - y) > (x + y)
i.e., I need to know whether y < 0.
This information is provided in (2). But (B) is not the answer.

Can you please tell me where I have made the mistake? Have I overlooked some rule in of inequality while simplifying?

OA: [spoiler](E)[/spoiler]
You can cross- multiply if and only if we know it is positive. In this question we dot know the sign - if it was negative then the inequality sign would change as well

Stmt I

x = 5, y = 10

the fraction is <1

x = 5, y = -1

the fraction is >1

Insufficient

Stmt II

x = 5, y = -1

the fraction is >1

x = 10, y = -10

the fraction is not defined

Insufficient

Stmt I and II

x = 10, y = -10

the fraction is not defined

x = 5, y = -1

the fraction is >1

[spoiler]Insufficient

E[/spoiler]
SACX
Join the discussion

Re: Inequality: A fundamental doubt

by Musiq » Tue Apr 07, 2009 9:43 am
Uri wrote:Image

I simplified the question as:
(x - y) > (x + y)
i.e., I need to know whether y < 0.
This information is provided in (2). But (B) is not the answer.

Can you please tell me where I have made the mistake? Have I overlooked some rule in of inequality while simplifying?

OA: [spoiler](E)[/spoiler]
Hi Uri,

My solution is hard to see, but if you can train yourself in Number Properties to think along similar lines, this will really really help you on test day.

Thought Process:
On a GMAT question, when you see inequalities that contain variables in conjunction with Division or Multiplication, the first thing you have to ask yourself is "What do I know about the SIGN of the variable?"

Q: Is (x-y) / (x+y) > 1?

We see variables, we see inequalities and we see division....RED ALERT.

Immediately focus your energies on trying to reframe the question.....this part is hard to see, but with practice will become easier.

Restated Question:
Is Absolute Value of (x-y) > Absolute Value of (x+y)?

The absolute value reframing of the question will allow you to multiply...since Absolute value cannot be negative.

Within 10 to 15 seconds you should eliminate answer choices A / B and D. We need information about both variables to answer the question....but each statement gives us only one variable.

It's between C & E now.

Since we dotn have the value of the variables we really cannot say Yes or NO with any conviction.

Leaves us with E as the answer.
For love, not money.
Join the discussion

by Uri » Tue Apr 07, 2009 11:26 am
thanks, buddies! i too was suspicious about the sign when dividing or cross multiplying in inequality problems. you all have done perfectly what i was looking for.

musiq, you have given a totally new method for me. i'll try this with some more problems. hope this method will work fine in all inequality problems involving variables and multiplication/ division.

thanks once again.
Join the discussion

by vpr » Tue Apr 07, 2009 11:31 am
Since you dont know the sign of (x+y), you cant multiply inequality by x+y to arrive at x-y>x+y. For example consider inequality 8>5. When you multiply this inequality by a positive number say 5, sign doesnt change (40>25) but when you multiply it by a negative number say -5, sign reverses (-40<-25). Point is you cant not multiply inequlity by a number whose sign you dont know.

Lets solve the original problem

x-y/x+y >1

x-y/x+y -1 > 0

x-y-x-y/x+y > 0

-2y/x+y > 0

or

y/x+y < 0

to have this one you can must have y and x+y opposite sign. So correct answer is E
Join the discussion

by cubicle_bound_misfit » Tue Apr 07, 2009 11:32 am
is (x-y)/(x+1) > 1?

==> is x-y/x+y -1 >0?

=> is -2y/x+y >0

=> is 2y/x+y < 0?

stmt 1. x>0 now for the expression to be true 2y and x+y shud be of opposite sign.

from x>0 if |x| > |Y| x<0 and y <0 this does not hold trur
x<0 and y>0 holds true. INSUFF

from stmt 2 Y < 0

again if x>0 Y< 0 but |Y| > |X| this does not hold

together, x>0 Y< 0 still teh expression can be positive.

Hence E.
Cubicle Bound Misfit
Join the discussion

by maihuna » Tue Apr 14, 2009 10:15 am
After simplifying the inequality I will get:

2y/x+y <0

just by knowing the sign of x and y we cant conclude, for example:

y = -1, x = 3 it works
y = -4, x=3 it doesnt

so E.
Join the discussion