Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Inequalities (Pos/Neg): Is x less than y ?

Expert replies
by II » Sun Mar 23, 2008 4:58 pm
Is x less than y ?

(1) 2x is less than 3y

(2) xy is greater than 0.

Interested in your logic in solving this question.

Thanks in advance.
Last edited by II on Mon May 05, 2008 1:47 am, edited 2 times in total.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Re: Inequalities ...

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Mon Mar 24, 2008 11:12 am
II wrote:Is x less than y ?

(1) 2x is less than 3y

(2) xy is greater than 0.

Interested in your logic in solving this question.

Thanks in advance.
(1) 2x < 3y

Let's pick numbers to see if we can get a yes and a no:

x = 1 y=20 (2 < 60)
Is 1 < 20? YES

x=2.5 y=2 (5 < 6)
Is 2.5 < 2? NO

YES and NO: insufficient.

(2) xy > 0

i.e. x and y are either both negative or both positive.
No info about values: insufficient.

Combined:

The numbers we chose for (1) are all positive, so they also follow (2). Therefore, we can pick the same numbers and still get a YES and a NO: not enough information, choose (E).
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

by II » Mon Mar 24, 2008 2:20 pm
Thanks Stuart. This was also the approach I used.
Is there another approach to solve this, apart from plugging-in numbers ?

Thanks.
Join the discussion

by cjiang16 » Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:22 pm
Join the discussion

by codesnooker » Tue Apr 08, 2008 12:12 am
II wrote: Is there another approach to solve this, apart from plugging-in numbers ?
Here is the another solution:-

Statement 1: 2X < 3Y

Now analyze this above statement....

X/Y <3/2


X/Y < 1.5

It means that X/Y could be greater than 1 also but always less than 1.5

To make X/Y >= 1, the Y should either be equal to X or less than X.


In other words, X could be less Y only in case X/Y < 1.

So statement 1 would be insufficient.

For statement 2 and combined, its simple as explained by Stuart.
Stuart wrote:(2) xy > 0

i.e. x and y are either both negative or both positive.
No info about values: insufficient.

Combined:

The numbers we chose for (1) are all positive, so they also follow (2). Therefore, we can pick the same numbers and still get a YES and a NO: not enough information, choose (E).
Hope it makes sense :D
Join the discussion

Re: Inequalities ...

by KICKGMATASS123 » Thu May 21, 2009 4:15 pm
Stuart Kovinsky wrote:
II wrote:Is x less than y ?

(1) 2x is less than 3y

(2) xy is greater than 0.

Interested in your logic in solving this question.

Thanks in advance.
(1) 2x < 3y

Let's pick numbers to see if we can get a yes and a no:

x = 1 y=20 (2 < 60)
Is 1 < 20? YES

x=2.5 y=2 (5 < 6)
Is 2.5 < 2? NO

YES and NO: insufficient.

(2) xy > 0

i.e. x and y are either both negative or both positive.
No info about values: insufficient.

Combined:

The numbers we chose for (1) are all positive, so they also follow (2). Therefore, we can pick the same numbers and still get a YES and a NO: not enough information, choose (E).
FOR STATEMENT 1 HOW DO YOU KNOW YOU IF YOU CAN ONLY PICK POSITIVE NUMBERS? HOW DO YOU DETERMINE THAT?
Join the discussion

Re: Inequalities ...

by aj5105 » Thu May 21, 2009 8:15 pm
We can pick any number with any sign we want to as long as the stem condition and condition in statement (1) are satisfied.

x < y : YES

x > y : NO


2x < 3y

2*1/2 < 3*1 (Considering x = 1/2 and y = 1 : YES)

2*1 < 3*1 (Considering x = 1 and y = 1 : NO)


KICKGMATASS123 wrote:
Stuart Kovinsky wrote:
II wrote:Is x less than y ?

(1) 2x is less than 3y

(2) xy is greater than 0.

Interested in your logic in solving this question.

Thanks in advance.
(1) 2x < 3y

Let's pick numbers to see if we can get a yes and a no:

x = 1 y=20 (2 < 60)
Is 1 < 20? YES

x=2.5 y=2 (5 < 6)
Is 2.5 < 2? NO

YES and NO: insufficient.

(2) xy > 0

i.e. x and y are either both negative or both positive.
No info about values: insufficient.

Combined:

The numbers we chose for (1) are all positive, so they also follow (2). Therefore, we can pick the same numbers and still get a YES and a NO: not enough information, choose (E).
FOR STATEMENT 1 HOW DO YOU KNOW YOU IF YOU CAN ONLY PICK POSITIVE NUMBERS? HOW DO YOU DETERMINE THAT?
Join the discussion