Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 1 and Nov 21. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 1
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 1 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand5 seats leftStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Industrial pollutants

Expert replies
by BlueDragon2010 » Tue Jan 28, 2014 7:08 pm
The industrial pollutants known as PCB’s were first manufactured in 1929 and were used as coolants for electrical equipment in Europe and North America until the 1970s, when studies showed that the compounds had entered the food chain and were harmful to some animals.

(A) that the compounds had entered the food chain and were harmful to some animals

(B) the compounds to have entered the food chain and be harmful to some animals

(C) the entry of the compounds into the food chain as harmful to some animals

(D) the entry of the compounds into the food chain and its harmfulness to animals

(E) the compounds entering into the food chain and harming some animals
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by Patrick_GMATFix » Tue Jan 28, 2014 7:34 pm
The precise meaning intended is that the study shows that compounds had entered the food chain and that those compounds were dangerous. Eliminate sentences saying that the study showed the compounds entering the food chain, or that the study showed the entry of the compounds into the food chain. These are imprecise in meaning. The full solution below is taken from the GMATFix App.

Image

-Patrick
  • Ask me about tutoring.
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Fri Mar 28, 2014 8:21 am
Hey!
Option "A" breaks parallelism.
showed that .. past perfect and simple past.
I don't UNDERSTAND, am I missing something?

Regards,
Mukherjee
EXPERTS Do HELP
Join the discussion

by neptune28 » Fri Mar 28, 2014 6:22 pm
[email protected] wrote:Hey!
Option "A" breaks parallelism.
showed that .. past perfect and simple past.
I don't UNDERSTAND, am I missing something?
It can be easy to overthink some of these questions, and this is one of them. ;) This sentence is actually pretty simple.

Choices B) - E) are all awkward and/or unidiomatic.

Choice A) does not really have anything to do with parallelism. What if you said:

The compounds had entered the food chain and had been harmful to some animals?

That would imply that the compounds were no longer harmful. But why would that be the case? Once harmful, pollutants are always harmful, unless you can find a way to get rid of them. It is not correct to assume that you can never use the past perfect and past tenses together.

Here's a case in which mixing the tenses would be incorrect:

I knew that she had visited my parents and gave them all the information on where I was last Friday night.

Hope this helps, Mukherjee.
Join the discussion