BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

India's rice production (OG13)

Expert replies
by alex.gellatly » Wed Jul 18, 2012 7:36 pm
In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to
about 41 million tons, nearly 25 percent less than
those of the 1978 harvest.

(A) less than those of the 1978 harvest
(B) less than the 1978 harvest
(C) less than 1978
(D) fewer than 1978
(E) fewer than that of India's 1978 harvest
Last edited by alex.gellatly on Thu Jul 19, 2012 2:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by eagleeye » Wed Jul 18, 2012 7:54 pm
alex.gellatly wrote:In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to
about 41 million tons, nearly 25 percent less than
those of the 1978 harvest.
(A) less than those of the 1978 harvest
(B) less than the 1978 harvest
(C) less than 1978
(D) fewer than 1978
(E) fewer than that of India's 1978 harvest
In this one we are comparing India's rice production in 1978 to India's rice production in 1978.

With that in mind let's look at the options.

In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to
about 41 million tons, nearly 25 percent less than
those of the 1978 harvest.

We need to pay attention to bold-ed phrases above.

(A) less than those of the 1978 harvest
The antecedent is "India's rice production". Production is a singular noun. Hence those is wrong. Subject-Pronoun verb error.No.

(B) less than the 1978 harvest
This is correct. The 1978 harvest is singular and parallel to "rice production" (which means the same as harvest here)

(C) less than 1978
Here we are comparing 1978 to India's rice production. This is an illogical comparison. No.

(D) fewer than 1978
25% is an amount and not a countable number. Wrong choice of comparative. Also we can't compare 1978 to production. Illogical comparison.No.

(E) fewer than that of India's 1978 harvest
This one corrects the comparison error but uses the wrong comparative because it uses fewer rather than less. No.

Hence B is correct.

:)
Join the discussion

by mv12 » Wed Jul 18, 2012 9:33 pm
My pick B.

India's rice production is not countable and hence less is more appropriate in this context.
Join the discussion

by alex.gellatly » Thu Jul 19, 2012 3:02 am
eagleeye wrote:
alex.gellatly wrote:In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to
about 41 million tons, nearly 25 percent less than
those of the 1978 harvest.
(A) less than those of the 1978 harvest
(B) less than the 1978 harvest
(C) less than 1978
(D) fewer than 1978
(E) fewer than that of India's 1978 harvest
In this one we are comparing India's rice production in 1978 to India's rice production in 1978.

With that in mind let's look at the options.

In 1979 lack of rain reduced India's rice production to
about 41 million tons, nearly 25 percent less than
those of the 1978 harvest.

We need to pay attention to bold-ed phrases above.

(A) less than those of the 1978 harvest
The antecedent is "India's rice production". Production is a singular noun. Hence those is wrong. Subject-Pronoun verb error.No.

(B) less than the 1978 harvest
This is correct. The 1978 harvest is singular and parallel to "rice production" (which means the same as harvest here)

(C) less than 1978
Here we are comparing 1978 to India's rice production. This is an illogical comparison. No.

(D) fewer than 1978
25% is an amount and not a countable number. Wrong choice of comparative. Also we can't compare 1978 to production. Illogical comparison.No.

(E) fewer than that of India's 1978 harvest
This one corrects the comparison error but uses the wrong comparative because it uses fewer rather than less. No.

Hence B is correct.

:)
Ah I see my mistake now, thanks. I feel so stupid. I picked E because I was thinking we were comparing tons (which is countable)
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1