OPTION A:- INCORRECT
The opposing candidate candidate reply didn't supply the statistics that undermines the incumbent;s conclusion. It only shed more light to the details of the statistics that the incumbent already stated.

OPTION B:- INCORRECT
The opposing candidate's reply points out the fact that the incumbent overlooked some facts in stating the statistics not that the statistics is factually inaccurate.

OPTION C:- INCORRECT
The option is quite closer to what the solution should be, but the opposing candidate didn't proceed on this fact. It proceeded on the fact that the statistics is completely preposterous which means that it is contrary to nature, reason or common sense, although it later shed some light on the statistics supplied by the incumbent.

OPTION D:- INCORRECT
This is incorrect because the statistics used by the incumbent is not completely irrelevant to his conclusion, the opposing candidate is only trying to resurface more reasons that could have lead to the low employment rate.

OPTION E:- CORRECT
The incumbent claimed to have created economic prosperity and job growth that has never been seen before, with a reference to the unemployment rate which ha reached its lowest point in nearly twenty years while the opposing candidate sees the claim to be preposterous and points out that the incumbents greatest achievement has been a series of retirement parties and moves to other states.
This clearly shows that the incumbent's statistics which is the rate of unemployment doesn't necessarily support his claim and might be as a result of the opposing candidate's claim.