BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem
TTP OnDemand GMAT Video Course
Featured Course

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.

  • 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
  • 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
  • 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
  • 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
  • 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
  • TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
  • 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
  • OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
  • Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
  • MBA Admissions Consulting now available
  • 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
  • 200,000+ students served
  • 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★ 5.0 (559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start then $127/mo
Start Free 5-Day Trial Read 559 Reviews →

increasing difficulty

Find out how Beat The GMAT members tackled GMAT test prep with positive results. Get tips on GMAT test prep materials, online courses, study tips, and more.
Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 3
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 10:34 am
Location: metro detroit
by cshmny86 » Wed Aug 20, 2008 10:44 am
I took the GMAT yesterday(8-19) for the second time around and received a 710, an improvement from my score this past December(680). Though my score was higher the second time around, the questions that were asked in both the quant and verbal sections seemed much more difficult than the test I took in December. The Quant section only seemed mildly more difficult, but the difference between the two verbal sections was outrageous in my opinion. I honestly feel if I would have sat for my second test the first time around I would not of even cracked 600. Has anyone else noticed this?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — I just Beat The GMAT! |
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 131
Joined: Mon May 05, 2008 10:46 am
Thanked: 1 times

by Mclaughlin » Wed Aug 20, 2008 2:13 pm
I took it in july and the verbal blew my mind, I was getting 99% in verbal in all my practice test and on the actual test i got 69%! needless to say I was stunned and confused. I'm gearing up to take it again and now i'm feeling nervous that it was just me, I have asked many people here and they keep saying it's my imagination. so its nice to hear i'm not the only one.

I think it might have to do with the scoretop controversy so they made the test harder!
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 47
Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 1:40 pmFollowed by: 1 member
Location: United States
Thanked: 2 times

by john1234 » Wed Aug 20, 2008 2:23 pm
cshmny86,
You are right. I said it last week but some folks here did not believe me. The verbal section of GMAT is becoming difficult lately,far more difficult than the GMATPREP.I guess GMAC is trying to make life difficult for test-takers these days
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 186
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 10:05 pm
Thanked: 2 times

by medea66 » Wed Aug 20, 2008 8:19 pm
There was another thread about this a few weeks ago....and some people argued that the controversy had nothing to do w/ the difficulty. I agree w/ you, in that it definitely has. Say the quality and quantity of your studies is the same and you took the test a couple years ago and post-controversey, the ones a couple years ago probably had a higher score.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2008 1:06 am

Re: increasing difficulty

by sandeep_koul » Wed Aug 20, 2008 9:15 pm
You are right, last time when I appeared in the test (Aug2008),I also felt that verbal has become much more tougher, than my previous appearnce in Gmat, especially those thick and wordy RC questions and cunning SC questions. Even on my first test on GMAT PREP, I scored around 38 in verbal and in subsequent 10 mock tests that I underwent, before appearing for the exams, I always scored in a range of 36-42, but in actual exams it was horrible 30.
Further I feel GMAT should immediately identify candidates who benefited from score top and cancel their scores, so that there is no inflation of GMAT scores i.e the bubble craeted in % ile ranking.

cshmny86 wrote:I took the GMAT yesterday(8-19) for the second time around and received a 710, an improvement from my score this past December(680). Though my score was higher the second time around, the questions that were asked in both the quant and verbal sections seemed much more difficult than the test I took in December. The Quant section only seemed mildly more difficult, but the difference between the two verbal sections was outrageous in my opinion. I honestly feel if I would have sat for my second test the first time around I would not of even cracked 600. Has anyone else noticed this?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 3
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 10:34 am
Location: metro detroit

by cshmny86 » Thu Aug 21, 2008 12:13 pm
I am glad I am not the only one as well, I felt that the verbal section was on the verge of being ridiculous in level of difficulty, darn dishonest people have ruin it for everyone.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 91
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 10:36 pm
Thanked: 1 times
GMAT Score:770

by BlueRain » Thu Aug 21, 2008 12:17 pm
Now you guys are making me nervous ... :(

1st GMAT on Saturday...
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 37
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2008 6:17 am
Thanked: 1 times

by rhymes_with_luck » Thu Aug 21, 2008 1:40 pm
Hey Bluerain,

let the first one be your last one.

Remember if it has gone tuf, then it will remain tuf for everybody and as a result average score for various schools will come down.
Moreover, if you have tried really really honestly you gonna pitch it.
All the best.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 3
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 10:34 am
Location: metro detroit

by cshmny86 » Thu Aug 21, 2008 3:36 pm
Blue Rain,

Dont let anything myself or anyone on this site says scare you. If you have prepared properly you will be just fine. The best advice I can personally give you would be to take a deep breath and read all questions in the verbal section thoroughly and carefully. I found myself at times zipping through the reading, selecting an answer, and realizing at the last second that I comprehended it wrong. 75 minutes is plenty of time for the verbal so really just calm down and dissect the words as carefully as possible and you will be just fine.

Best of luck!
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 91
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 10:36 pm
Thanked: 1 times
GMAT Score:770

by BlueRain » Sun Aug 24, 2008 9:49 pm
Woot! As I said on the other thread, I beat GMAT with flying colors. I did not notice any significant changes in the verbal difficulty to be honest, and I actually found the SC questions to be easier on the actual GMAT, and I thought I was heading down the wrong path for a while there. NOTE: this is based on a very unscientific, personal comparison between OG and actual GMAT. SC was my weak point in the verbal questions (~80% strike rate vs ~90% on RC and CR).

The only difficulty I've encounted was a fairly short RC yet very difficult to understand. It required a ton of inferences in order to make the connections between various points, but at that point, I was way ahead of the timing schedule, so I spent 5+ minutes reading and re-reading the passage, and I am still not sure I understood it fully. Yet, I still finished verbal with around 10 minutes to spare if I recall correctly. :roll: So I was really nervous about the scores at that point because I definitely went way too fast.

Hopefully this will help people to prepare for the verbal in the future. I feel that if you truly understand the fundamentals instead of aiming for quick success using test tricks/strategies, you will do fine.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 92
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2008 2:24 pm
Location: Fresno, CA
Thanked: 3 times

by emrahercan » Tue Aug 26, 2008 7:17 am
Guys, if a question is hard, it will be hard for everybody. GMAT score is based on how you did compared to others. So if you got 95 % on quant and re-took the test and got 70 %. It really does not mean questions are getting harder and you are getting lower score but people are studying more for GMAT ;-)
GMAT DELIGHT
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 215
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 8:07 am

by rosh26 » Tue Aug 26, 2008 12:35 pm
Same discussion is going on in strategy -

https://www.beatthegmat.com/major-issue- ... 17023.html

Do you think it would be more beneficial to call as opposed to just emailing?

Just a thought...
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1