BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Income-averaging law

Expert replies
by Sunny22uk » Wed Aug 06, 2008 11:33 am
State X's income-averaging law allows a portion of one's income to be taxed at lower rate than the rate based on one's total taxable income. To use income averaging, the taxpayer must have earned taxable income for a particular year that exceeds 140 percent of his or her average taxable income for the previous three years. People using income averaging owe less tax for that year than they would without income averaging.
Which of the following individuals would be most seriously affected if income averaging were not permitted in computing the taxes owed for current year?
(A) Individuals whose income has steadily decreased for the past three years
(B) Individuals whose income increased by 50 percent four years ago and has remained the same since then
(C) Individuals whose income has doubled this year after remaining about the same for five years
(D) Individuals who had no income this year, but did in each of the previous three years
(E) Individuals who are retired and whose income has remained about the same for the past ten years

OA after some discussions
You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to loose sight of the shore.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Re: Income-averaging law

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Wed Aug 06, 2008 11:38 am
Sunny22uk wrote:State X's income-averaging law allows a portion of one's income to be taxed at lower rate than the rate based on one's total taxable income. To use income averaging, the taxpayer must have earned taxable income for a particular year that exceeds 140 percent of his or her average taxable income for the previous three years. People using income averaging owe less tax for that year than they would without income averaging.
Which of the following individuals would be most seriously affected if income averaging were not permitted in computing the taxes owed for current year?
(A) Individuals whose income has steadily decreased for the past three years
(B) Individuals whose income increased by 50 percent four years ago and has remained the same since then
(C) Individuals whose income has doubled this year after remaining about the same for five years
(D) Individuals who had no income this year, but did in each of the previous three years
(E) Individuals who are retired and whose income has remained about the same for the past ten years

OA after some discussions
We want to know who would be most affected if income averaging were NOT allowed THIS YEAR. Therefore, we need to find someone who qualifies for income averaging this year.

To qualify, "the taxpayer must have earned taxable income for a particular year that exceeds 140 percent of his or her average taxable income for the previous three years." Only the person in choice (C) satisfies the test: choose (C).
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

by Sunny22uk » Wed Aug 06, 2008 11:47 am
Hi Stuart, thanks for your reply. the OA is indeed C. I got your explanation, I was adding 140% of average taxable income to the average taxable income :evil:
You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to loose sight of the shore.
Join the discussion

by lalitgmat » Wed Aug 06, 2008 11:52 am
"if income averaging were not permitted" Then it voids the facts given in para. Although it is NOT clear how total taxable income is calculated, but 140% of avg of last 3 year taxes is GOOD. Hence, More Taxable Income than prev years. (C) has 100%, hence (C)
Join the discussion

by khanshainur » Wed May 11, 2016 2:42 am
I would go with option C as the correct option
Join the discussion