BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

in the united states

Expert replies
by kartik1979 » Mon Nov 09, 2009 6:19 am
In the United States, while the number of foreign-born residents and their children is higher than ever, the percentage of the population they represent is not, in 1910 this group made up 35 percent of the population when compared to 20 percent in 2000.

A. population when compared to 20 percent in 2000
B. population as compared to 2000, when it was 20 percent
C. population, comparing it with 20 percent in 2000
D. population, unlike 2000, with 20 percent
E. population, compared with 20 percent in 2000

[spoiler]couldnt understand what does "compared with" modify in E
as per rules it should be "Population"[/spoiler]
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by gmatv09 » Mon Nov 09, 2009 9:08 am
First, we need to choose "compared with" because we are comparing like things
==> elim A & B

IMO C&D are wordy..

Ans E
Join the discussion

by tanviet » Tue Nov 10, 2009 1:46 am
Very hard, I try to do

A and B mean "this group" is compared to number and not logic.

C means "this group" is comparing. No logic

D mean "this group" is unlike 2000. No logic

E is left."compared with" modify "35 percent" not "population" because of the comma.
Join the discussion

by raghavakumar85 » Tue Nov 10, 2009 2:11 am
To identify either the similarities or the differences between two things, use "compare to."

To identify both the similarities and the differences, use "compare with."

In comparing with something, one finds or discusses both things that are alike and things that are different.

Here, we are trying to compare the numbers and the percentages. So, it is E.

EDIT: This could help. https://homepage.smc.edu/quizzes/cheney_ ... mpare.html
Join the discussion

Re: in the united states

by capnx » Tue Nov 10, 2009 7:10 am
kartik1979 wrote:In the United States, while the number of foreign-born residents and their children is higher than ever, the percentage of the population they represent is not, in 1910 this group made up 35 percent of the population when compared to 20 percent in 2000.

A. population when compared to 20 percent in 2000
B. population as compared to 2000, when it was 20 percent
C. population, comparing it with 20 percent in 2000
D. population, unlike 2000, with 20 percent
E. population, compared with 20 percent in 2000
From the original sentence, the comparison should be based on the percentage.
A - "when" is unidiomatic
B - is comparing "years", not percentages
C - it is ambiguous: population or percentage?
D - is comparing "years"
E - using past participle to compare percent.

From Manhattan Prep, the idioms list says "compare to" is for similarities and "compare with" is for differences. But I find that the difference is so slight, sometimes it's better to find other mistakes in the choices than to eliminate a choice solely on the compare to/with alone.
Join the discussion


• Page 1 of 1