BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

General quant factorials doubt

Expert replies
by bblast » Mon Aug 29, 2011 12:54 am
How to determine whether a factorial added to an integer is prime or non prime ?

If I take a small factorial :

1>(4! + 3) is non prime at first sight, as we can factor out a 3 from this expression.

On the other hand :

2>My doubt is when we cant factor out anything common from the factorial and integer :
(4! + 11) = 35 is non prime
while (4! + 7) = 31 is prime.

So how to determine whether (81! + 82) or any other factorial combined with a huge number is prime or not ?
Cheers !!

Quant 47-Striving for 50
Verbal 34-Striving for 40

My gmat journey :
https://www.beatthegmat.com/710-bblast-s ... 90735.html
My take on the GMAT RC :
https://www.beatthegmat.com/ways-to-bbla ... 90808.html
How to prepare before your MBA:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upz46D7 ... TWBZF14TKW_
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by Whitney Garner » Mon Aug 29, 2011 4:43 am
bblast wrote:How to determine whether a factorial added to an integer is prime or non prime ?

If I take a small factorial :

1>(4! + 3) is non prime at first sight, as we can factor out a 3 from this expression.

On the other hand :

2>My doubt is when we cant factor out anything common from the factorial and integer :
(4! + 11) = 35 is non prime
while (4! + 7) = 31 is prime.

So how to determine whether (81! + 82) or any other factorial combined with a huge number is prime or not ?
Hi bblast!

Great question but sadly, one that has no good answer. If you are adding a number to a factorial and they share NO common factors - there is NO way to tell if the result will be prime!

Sadly/interestingly, primes are elusive little buggers (the reason they are often used in cryptology) - hence why there are no formulas or patterns for determining them!!

Good news - the GMAT will not give you a problem that necessitates you actually knowing if the number is prime or not (you will not have to directly answer). AND, even if they did give it to you in a DS, they could only do so with the understanding that you would "know" there was an answer, even if you didn't know what that answer was. Example (totally made up):

Can the positive integer x be written as the product of 2 integers, both greater than 1?

1) x=2k+1 where k is a positive integer

2) x = 26! + 37


The question is just using fancy wording for the real question "is x non-prime". Statement (1) only tells us that x is odd, so NS to determine if x is prime. Statement (2), however, gives us an actual value for x. We have NO CLUE what that value is and couldn't tell you without calculating it whether it was prime - BUT, it is a single number and therefore could only be prime or non-prime, so Sufficient. We don't know which it is, but we know that it is only one (a single number cannot be both).

Hope this helps!


:)
Whit
Whitney Garner
GMAT/GRE/EA Instructor & Anxiety/Accommodations Coach
www.whitneygarner.com

Contributor to Beat The GMAT!

Math is a lot like love - a simple idea that can easily get complicated :heart-eyes:
Join the discussion

by bblast » Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:27 am
Thanks Whit, I was skeptical before posting this stuff. But after reading ur explanation I got a lot of takeaways from the issue. Thanks a lot !!!
Cheers !!

Quant 47-Striving for 50
Verbal 34-Striving for 40

My gmat journey :
https://www.beatthegmat.com/710-bblast-s ... 90735.html
My take on the GMAT RC :
https://www.beatthegmat.com/ways-to-bbla ... 90808.html
How to prepare before your MBA:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upz46D7 ... TWBZF14TKW_
Join the discussion

by saketk » Tue Aug 30, 2011 11:39 am
Hey -- Although you got your answer, I just wanted to say that (81! + 82) is not a prime number :)

81! is an even integer.. 82 is also even.. Even+Even = Even
only 2 is an exception, rest all Even are not prime.

I agree with Whit. GMAT wont actually expect you to solve big numbers. You have to use logic!!
Join the discussion

by prateek_guy2004 » Tue Aug 30, 2011 12:12 pm
I am little unsure about the 2nd statement...Though its yes/no ques and dosent need a yes to be sufficient...
Don't look for the incorrect things that you have done rather look for remedies....

https://www.beatthegmat.com/motivation-t90253.html
Join the discussion

by czarczar » Wed Aug 31, 2011 12:50 pm
saketk wrote:Hey -- Although you got your answer, I just wanted to say that (81! + 82) is not a prime number :)

81! is an even integer.. 82 is also even.. Even+Even = Even
only 2 is an exception, rest all Even are not prime.

I agree with Whit. GMAT wont actually expect you to solve big numbers. You have to use logic!!
Well said.
Join the discussion