BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

In most businesses, refusing to employ someone with a crimin

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorDC » Mon Mar 25, 2019 9:53 pm

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

B

C

D

E

Stats

Difficulty—

In most businesses, refusing to employ someone with a criminal record violates federal hiring regulations. The LMN Corporation is not exempt from this regulation, yet an analysis of their hiring practices shows that they have not hired anyone with a criminal record for the past five years, even though they have had numerous opportunities to do so. Whether the corporation has actually violated the regulation, however, depends entirely on whether those in a position to hire were aware of the applicants' criminal records.

Which of the following points out a weakness in the argument above?

(A) The LMN corporation hired several people with criminal records between 5 and 10 years ago.

(B) The LMN corporation is owned by a business that, for security reasons, is exempt from the hiring regulation.

(C) An applicant who makes it clear that he or she has a criminal record might have been refused employment for that reason, or for an unrelated reason.

(D) Most of the applicants with criminal records who were refused employment at LMN were then able to easily find employment at similar businesses.

(E) The hiring regulation was put into place six years ago.

OA C

Source: Veritas Prep
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by deloitte247 » Sat Apr 06, 2019 4:47 am
OPTION A - INCORRECT
This doesn't weaken the argument because if the LMN corporation hired several people with criminal record between 5 to 10 years ago, it means they are not in violation of the federal hiring regulations.

OPTION B - INCORRECT
This cannot weaken the argument because the corporation has been exempted from hiring regulations for security reasons

OPTION C - CORRECT
This option provides a weakness to the argument because it provides the evidence to show that the corporation has violated the hiring regulations which is the awareness of an applicants criminal record

OPTION D - INCORRECT
The facts that applicants with criminal records were refused employment at LMN is well stated in the argument, and then finding a new one at a similar business doesn't weaken the argument

OPTION E - INCORRECT
Well, this doesn't go against or weaken the argument because the years in question is five (5) which means that if the hiring regulations was put in place 6 years ago, it is still in range of the proposed years.
Join the discussion