BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

In most businesses, refusing to employ someone with a crimin

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorDC » Mon Mar 25, 2019 9:53 pm

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

B

C

D

E

Stats

Difficulty

In most businesses, refusing to employ someone with a criminal record violates federal hiring regulations. The LMN Corporation is not exempt from this regulation, yet an analysis of their hiring practices shows that they have not hired anyone with a criminal record for the past five years, even though they have had numerous opportunities to do so. Whether the corporation has actually violated the regulation, however, depends entirely on whether those in a position to hire were aware of the applicants' criminal records.

Which of the following points out a weakness in the argument above?

(A) The LMN corporation hired several people with criminal records between 5 and 10 years ago.

(B) The LMN corporation is owned by a business that, for security reasons, is exempt from the hiring regulation.

(C) An applicant who makes it clear that he or she has a criminal record might have been refused employment for that reason, or for an unrelated reason.

(D) Most of the applicants with criminal records who were refused employment at LMN were then able to easily find employment at similar businesses.

(E) The hiring regulation was put into place six years ago.

OA C

Source: Veritas Prep
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by deloitte247 » Sat Apr 06, 2019 4:47 am
OPTION A - INCORRECT
This doesn't weaken the argument because if the LMN corporation hired several people with criminal record between 5 to 10 years ago, it means they are not in violation of the federal hiring regulations.

OPTION B - INCORRECT
This cannot weaken the argument because the corporation has been exempted from hiring regulations for security reasons

OPTION C - CORRECT
This option provides a weakness to the argument because it provides the evidence to show that the corporation has violated the hiring regulations which is the awareness of an applicants criminal record

OPTION D - INCORRECT
The facts that applicants with criminal records were refused employment at LMN is well stated in the argument, and then finding a new one at a similar business doesn't weaken the argument

OPTION E - INCORRECT
Well, this doesn't go against or weaken the argument because the years in question is five (5) which means that if the hiring regulations was put in place 6 years ago, it is still in range of the proposed years.
Join the discussion