Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

In January

Expert replies
by varundaga05 » Fri Jun 25, 2010 3:51 am
In January there was a large drop in the number of new houses sold, because interest rates for mortgages were falling and many consumers were waiting to see how low the rates would go. This large sales drop was accompanied by a sharp rise in the average price of new houses sold.
Which of the following, if true, best explains the sharp rise in the average price of new houses?
(A) Sales of higher-priced houses were unaffected by the sales drop because their purchasers have fewer constraints limiting the total amount they pay.
(B) Labor agreements of builders with construction unions are not due to expire until the next January.
(C) The prices of new houses have been rising slowly over the past three years because there is an increasing shortage of housing.
(D) There was a greater amount of moderate-priced housing available for resale by owners during January than in the preceding three months.
(E) Interest rates for home mortgages are expected to rise sharply later in the year if predictions of increased business activity in general prove to be accurate

ANS : A
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by albatross86 » Fri Jun 25, 2010 4:26 am
Drop in number of house sold because interest rates were following and consumers were waiting.
The average price of a house increased sharply.

Which of the following explains this rise?

A. Bingo. This suggests that though the overall sales reduced, all the higher priced houses were still sold. So say there were 10 highpriced houses costing 100$ each and 50 other houses costing 30$ each. The average price before was about 40$. Now let's say 30 of those other houses did not sell. BUT remember, those 10 highpriced houses are going to sell anyway! So our new average price has gone up to about 48$. So, total sales reduced but highpriced sales remained constant - this explains the rise.

B. Irrelevant, no evident effect on prices.

C. Steady rise over the past 3 years. Does this explain the SHARP rise now?

D. AVAILABLE for resale. Does that mean they sold or that they affected the average price? Too vague.

E. Interest rates are going to rise. This could actually indicate people would want to pay LESS for the house to compensate for the impending increased expense. Doesn't explain the sharp rise.


Pick A.
Join the discussion

by nikhilkatira » Fri Jun 25, 2010 4:31 am
albatross86 wrote:Drop in number of house sold because interest rates were following and consumers were waiting.
The average price of a house increased sharply.

Which of the following explains this rise?

A. Bingo. This suggests that though the overall sales reduced, all the higher priced houses were still sold. So say there were 10 highpriced houses costing 100$ each and 50 other houses costing 30$ each. The average price before was about 40$. Now let's say 30 of those other houses did not sell. BUT remember, those 10 highpriced houses are going to sell anyway! So our new average price has gone up to about 48$. So, total sales reduced but highpriced sales remained constant - this explains the rise.

B. Irrelevant, no evident effect on prices.

C. Steady rise over the past 3 years. Does this explain the SHARP rise now?

D. AVAILABLE for resale. Does that mean they sold or that they affected the average price? Too vague.

E. Interest rates are going to rise. This could actually indicate people would want to pay LESS for the house to compensate for the impending increased expense. Doesn't explain the sharp rise.


Pick A.
I like your reasoning for Option C...keep it up albatross86
Best,
Nikhil H. Katira
Join the discussion