BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

In a recent experiment, a spider breed was chosen as a

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorDC » Wed Jan 01, 2020 10:21 pm
In a recent experiment, a spider breed was chosen as a potential natural pesticide to reduce the numbers of a certain insect that is very harmful specifically to growing watermelons. In an average infested watermelon field, tagged spiders were released, and their feeding monitored for a month. Results of the experiment showed that although the spiders ate extremely well, the number of pests remained the same as the month before. Therefore, the spiders must have eaten other insects and not their intended prey.

Which of the following would it be most useful to establish in order to evaluate the argument?


A. Whether the harmful insect is preyed upon by any other predators, be they insects or small creatures

B. Whether the particular breed of spider chosen also causes harm to watermelons due to its nesting

C. Whether the number of spiders equalled the number of watermelon pests after one month

D. Whether the field already contained spiders that perhaps prey upon the watermelon pests

E. Whether previous population figures for the watermelon pest show an increase over time




OA E

Source: Economist Gmat
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Premise: In a recent experiment, a spider breed was chosen as a potential natural pesticide to reduce the number of a certain insect that is very harmful specifically to growing watermelon.

Conclusion: Although the spiders ate extremely well, the number of pests remained the same as the month before. Therefore, the spiders must have eaten other insects and not their intended prey.

Option A - Incorrect:
This option cannot evaluate the argument because a spider breed was chosen as a potential natural pesticide. Hence, we have no idea about other predators that must have preyed upon the harmful insects.

Option B - Incorrect:
We can't know if this claim is true as there is no information about the harmful effects of the spider breed chosen.

Option C - Incorrect:
There is no evidence to back up this claim because we are not concerned about the number of spiders in the field. Therefore, this option is invalid.

Option D - Incorrect:
This option is false because if the field already contained spiders, the number of pests in the field would not remain the same. Hence, the field didn't contain spiders that preyed upon watermelon pests.

Option E - Correct:
This option evaluates the argument. Results of the experiment showed that the spiders ate extremely well, this shows that the spiders preyed upon the pests yet the number of pests remained the same, which is as a result of the increase in the watermelon pests.
Join the discussion