In a 5-to-4 decision，the Supreme Court ruled that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians for the unlawful seizure of their ancestral lands in the eighteenth century．
(A) that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes of 0neida Indians for the unlawful seizure of
(B) that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians because of their unlawful seizure of
(C) two upstate New York counties to owe restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians for their unlawful seizure of
(D) on two upstate New York counties that owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians because they unlawfully seized
(E) 0n the restitution that two upstate New York counties owed to three tribes of 0neida Indians for the unlawful seizure of
[spoiler]
OA: A even i got the correct, but my question here is that option A
uses " that .....owed "
but as a common rule where the comanding word approach is used it is said that we use "owe"
so why the usage of owed is correct here...
need help badly on this one..
thanks[/spoiler]
(A) that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes of 0neida Indians for the unlawful seizure of
(B) that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians because of their unlawful seizure of
(C) two upstate New York counties to owe restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians for their unlawful seizure of
(D) on two upstate New York counties that owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians because they unlawfully seized
(E) 0n the restitution that two upstate New York counties owed to three tribes of 0neida Indians for the unlawful seizure of
[spoiler]
OA: A even i got the correct, but my question here is that option A
uses " that .....owed "
but as a common rule where the comanding word approach is used it is said that we use "owe"
so why the usage of owed is correct here...
need help badly on this one..
thanks[/spoiler]
