BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

In 2001 the Peruvian government began requiring tourists

Expert replies
by vinni.k » Fri Apr 06, 2012 8:42 am
In 2001 the Peruvian government began requiring tourists to buy expensive permits to hike the remote Inca Trail, which goes to the ancient city of Machu Picchu, The total number of permits is strictly limited; infact, only 500 people per day are now allowed to hike the Inca Trail, whereas before 2001 daily visitors numbered in the thousands. The Peruvian government claims that this permit program has successfully prevented deterioration of archaeological treasures along the Inca Trail.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument above?

(A)Since 2001, tourist guides along the Inca Trail have received 50% to 100% increases in take-home pay.

(B)Villages near Machu Picchu have experienced declines in income, as fewer tourists buy fewer craft goods and refreshments.

(C)Many of the funds from the sale of Inca Trail permits are used to staff a museum of Incan culture in Lima, Peru's capital, and to hire guards for archaeological sites without permit programs.

(D)Since 2001, Incan ruins similar to Machu Picchu but not on the Inca Trail have disintegrated at a significantly greater rate than those on the Inca Trail.

(E)The total number of tourists in Peru has risen substantially since 2001, even as the number of tourists hiking the Inca Trail has remained constant.

Answer is D

Can anyone please explain in detail how to get through the right answer.

Thanks & Regards
Vinni
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Bill@VeritasPrep » Fri Apr 06, 2012 8:52 am
Conclusion: the permit program has prevented archaelogical deterioration.

Evidence: In 2001, the permit requirement started, reducing daily visitors to 500 from "thousands."

Is this a convincing argument? Not particularly; there's no link demonstrated between the reduction in visitors and the reduction in deterioration. To strengthen, we'll need to provide that link.

A--the pay of tourist guides is irrelevant to visitors and deterioration

B--village income is also irrelevant to the argument

C--the museum in Lima and other archaeological sites are irrelevant.

D--If similar sites without the permit program show higher deterioration rates, then it is evidence that the permit program has had some effect on the Inca Trail's deterioration rates

E--we only care about visitors to the Inca Trail, not visitors to Peru in general

Really, once we've identified the conclusion here, D is the only one that fits.
Join Veritas Prep's 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays

Visit the Veritas Prep Blog

Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test
Join the discussion

by vinni.k » Fri Apr 06, 2012 10:51 am
Thanks Bill. Appreciate your reply.

I marked C and D as contenders but got confused with the wording of D. May be i was reading too fast that i didn't realize that C is talking about Peru and not Machu Picchu.

What is the level of this question ? Does it comes under hard question type or medium question type ?

Thanks & Regards
Vinni
Join the discussion

by seal4913 » Fri Apr 06, 2012 1:45 pm
vinni.k wrote:Thanks Bill. Appreciate your reply.

I marked C and D as contenders but got confused with the wording of D. May be i was reading too fast that i didn't realize that C is talking about Peru and not Machu Picchu.

What is the level of this question ? Does it comes under hard question type or medium question type ?

Thanks & Regards
Vinni
After reading a lot of differnt CR I think this falls under easy
Join the discussion

by Bill@VeritasPrep » Fri Apr 06, 2012 6:41 pm
It's fairly straightforward once you know what you're looking for, but I can see how it could trip people up.
Join Veritas Prep's 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays

Visit the Veritas Prep Blog

Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test
Join the discussion

by GmatKiss » Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:20 pm
IMO : D
Join the discussion