BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

In 2000, Gregory's Grocery had a total of 50

Expert replies
by aspirant2011 » Sat Aug 13, 2011 9:00 pm
In 2000, Gregory's Grocery had a total of 50 stores in the United States and reported profits of $50 million in 2000. During the next five years, the chain added 20 stores per year for a total of 150 stores in the United States and Canada in 2005. Profits increased each year at a rate of 10 percent.
Which of the following can be concluded based on the passage above?

A. The stores in Canada were not as profitable as those in the United States.
B. Between 2000 and 2005, average revenue per store decreased.
C. On average, the stores were less profitable in 2005 than in 2000.
D. Profit per store, or average profit, will continue to decrease if the chain continues to expand the number of stores.
E. If Gregory's Grocery shuts down some of its stores, average profitability will increase.

[spoiler]OA: I am confused in one thing i.e the difference between Revenue and Profit. Why exactly is B wrong????

If I see option B then initially the average revenue which used to come was 1 million $ per store but if I increase 50 by 5% then it becomes 55 but at the same time the number of stores in 1 year increase to 70,therefore revenue goes less than 1 million USD.

Please clear my doubt.........[/spoiler]
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by VivianKerr » Sat Aug 13, 2011 10:00 pm
Evidence: In 2000, 50 stores = $50 million profit. Added 20 stores/yr for 5 years, profit increase 10%/yr.

Question: What can be concluded?

Prediction: Look for an answer that is close to the statistics that requires the smallest assumptions.

A. Requires assumptions about the countries.
B. Some uncertainty here since we can't compare "profits" to "revenues"
C. This requires a lot less info than B. It's worded in a safe, general way and is correct.
D. We have no idea what the future holds.
E. We have no idea as to how certain stores affect profitability.
Vivian Kerr
GMAT Rockstar, Tutor
https://www.GMATrockstar.com
https://www.yelp.com/biz/gmat-rockstar-los-angeles

Former Kaplan and Grockit instructor, freelance GMAT content creator, now offering affordable, effective, Skype-tutoring for the GMAT at $150/hr. Contact: [email protected]

Thank you for all the "thanks" and "follows"! :-)
Join the discussion

by aspirant2011 » Sat Aug 13, 2011 10:11 pm
VivianKerr wrote:Evidence: In 2000, 50 stores = $50 million profit. Added 20 stores/yr for 5 years, profit increase 10%/yr.

Question: What can be concluded?

Prediction: Look for an answer that is close to the statistics that requires the smallest assumptions.

A. Requires assumptions about the countries.
B. Some uncertainty here since we can't compare "profits" to "revenues"
C. This requires a lot less info than B. It's worded in a safe, general way and is correct.
D. We have no idea what the future holds.
E. We have no idea as to how certain stores affect profitability.
Thanks a lot vivian for your response. Is there any difference between the meaning of profits & revenues?????
Join the discussion

by sandy217 » Sun Aug 14, 2011 12:04 am
I treat this more as a quantitative than a verbal.
50 stores 50 million profits =profit/per store 1
after five years store 150 and profits 80 million(approx) profit per store 80/150 <1

Hence C

we dont have any idea about revenues.From profits we cannot say revenues increased/decreased.Profit can increase with decrease in revenues,and converse also possible.
Join the discussion

by need720+ » Sun Aug 14, 2011 12:25 am
IMO C

In very simple terms, profit = revenue - expenditure.. B cannot be right.. We don't know why profitability did not rise.. It could be because the revenues did not increase or the expenditures did not decrease..
Join the discussion

by aspirant2011 » Sun Aug 14, 2011 3:54 am
need720+ wrote:IMO C

In very simple terms, profit = revenue - expenditure.. B cannot be right.. We don't know why profitability did not rise.. It could be because the revenues did not increase or the expenditures did not decrease..
Thanks a lot :-)
Join the discussion

by cyrwr1 » Mon Aug 15, 2011 2:57 pm
B can be eliminated as it features revenue.

Profit is very different from Revenue.

You might want to remember this permanently as you will see this in the business world and GMAT Quant.

Profits = Sales(or Revenue) - Cost(Expenditure)

B uses the classical example of shell game as with a short glance, the reader might misread revenues as profits.
Join the discussion