BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

In 2000, Gregory's Grocery had a total of 50

Expert replies
by aspirant2011 » Sat Aug 13, 2011 9:00 pm
In 2000, Gregory's Grocery had a total of 50 stores in the United States and reported profits of $50 million in 2000. During the next five years, the chain added 20 stores per year for a total of 150 stores in the United States and Canada in 2005. Profits increased each year at a rate of 10 percent.
Which of the following can be concluded based on the passage above?

A. The stores in Canada were not as profitable as those in the United States.
B. Between 2000 and 2005, average revenue per store decreased.
C. On average, the stores were less profitable in 2005 than in 2000.
D. Profit per store, or average profit, will continue to decrease if the chain continues to expand the number of stores.
E. If Gregory's Grocery shuts down some of its stores, average profitability will increase.

[spoiler]OA: I am confused in one thing i.e the difference between Revenue and Profit. Why exactly is B wrong????

If I see option B then initially the average revenue which used to come was 1 million $ per store but if I increase 50 by 5% then it becomes 55 but at the same time the number of stores in 1 year increase to 70,therefore revenue goes less than 1 million USD.

Please clear my doubt.........[/spoiler]
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by VivianKerr » Sat Aug 13, 2011 10:00 pm
Evidence: In 2000, 50 stores = $50 million profit. Added 20 stores/yr for 5 years, profit increase 10%/yr.

Question: What can be concluded?

Prediction: Look for an answer that is close to the statistics that requires the smallest assumptions.

A. Requires assumptions about the countries.
B. Some uncertainty here since we can't compare "profits" to "revenues"
C. This requires a lot less info than B. It's worded in a safe, general way and is correct.
D. We have no idea what the future holds.
E. We have no idea as to how certain stores affect profitability.
Vivian Kerr
GMAT Rockstar, Tutor
https://www.GMATrockstar.com
https://www.yelp.com/biz/gmat-rockstar-los-angeles

Former Kaplan and Grockit instructor, freelance GMAT content creator, now offering affordable, effective, Skype-tutoring for the GMAT at $150/hr. Contact: [email protected]

Thank you for all the "thanks" and "follows"! :-)
Join the discussion

by aspirant2011 » Sat Aug 13, 2011 10:11 pm
VivianKerr wrote:Evidence: In 2000, 50 stores = $50 million profit. Added 20 stores/yr for 5 years, profit increase 10%/yr.

Question: What can be concluded?

Prediction: Look for an answer that is close to the statistics that requires the smallest assumptions.

A. Requires assumptions about the countries.
B. Some uncertainty here since we can't compare "profits" to "revenues"
C. This requires a lot less info than B. It's worded in a safe, general way and is correct.
D. We have no idea what the future holds.
E. We have no idea as to how certain stores affect profitability.
Thanks a lot vivian for your response. Is there any difference between the meaning of profits & revenues?????
Join the discussion

by sandy217 » Sun Aug 14, 2011 12:04 am
I treat this more as a quantitative than a verbal.
50 stores 50 million profits =profit/per store 1
after five years store 150 and profits 80 million(approx) profit per store 80/150 <1

Hence C

we dont have any idea about revenues.From profits we cannot say revenues increased/decreased.Profit can increase with decrease in revenues,and converse also possible.
Join the discussion

by need720+ » Sun Aug 14, 2011 12:25 am
IMO C

In very simple terms, profit = revenue - expenditure.. B cannot be right.. We don't know why profitability did not rise.. It could be because the revenues did not increase or the expenditures did not decrease..
Join the discussion

by aspirant2011 » Sun Aug 14, 2011 3:54 am
need720+ wrote:IMO C

In very simple terms, profit = revenue - expenditure.. B cannot be right.. We don't know why profitability did not rise.. It could be because the revenues did not increase or the expenditures did not decrease..
Thanks a lot :-)
Join the discussion

by cyrwr1 » Mon Aug 15, 2011 2:57 pm
B can be eliminated as it features revenue.

Profit is very different from Revenue.

You might want to remember this permanently as you will see this in the business world and GMAT Quant.

Profits = Sales(or Revenue) - Cost(Expenditure)

B uses the classical example of shell game as with a short glance, the reader might misread revenues as profits.
Join the discussion