Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 1 and Nov 21. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 1
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 1 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand5 seats leftStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

In 1990’s

Expert replies
by deepamohn » Fri Dec 05, 2008 11:32 am
In 1990’s, there are more babies born by women over thirty years old than under it.


(A) than under it
(B) than were they under it
(C) than had been under it
(D) than were the babies
(E) than those were under it


OA A
Why not [spoiler] E ? [/spoiler]
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

Re: In 1990’s

by iamcste » Fri Dec 05, 2008 12:52 pm
deepamohn wrote:In 1990’s, there are more babies born by women over thirty years old than under it.


(A) than under it
(B) than were they under it
(C) than had been under it
(D) than were the babies
(E) than those were under it


OA A
Why not [spoiler] E ? [/spoiler]


Ha haa haa...


Now check options

In, E -"those " can refer to babies as well as the women...

So does B

C-Past perfect is not reqd, constrn awkward

D-Illogical

Note: There is , are --filpped questions


Althôugh A is the OA, Pls let me source of qtn
Join the discussion

by deepamohn » Fri Dec 05, 2008 7:38 pm
Thx. This question is from 1000SC.

https://thousandsc.blocked/2006/04/qn359.html
Join the discussion

Re: In 1990’s

by logitech » Fri Dec 05, 2008 7:44 pm
In 1990’s, there are more babies born by women over thirty years old than babies born by women under thirty years.


(A) than under it

I hope you can understand why (A) is correct now. By the way I think the THOSE in E clearly refers to babies, but the construction was awkward.

In 1990’s, there are more babies born by women over thirty years old than those born by women under thirty years.
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Join the discussion

by ronniecoleman » Sat Dec 06, 2008 5:46 am
how badly the 1000 SC source can be... this question clearly shows...

Kudos to above people...who are still justifying the answers :D
Admission champion, Hauz khaz
011-27565856
Join the discussion

by tisrar02 » Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:50 pm
ronniecoleman wrote:how badly the 1000 SC source can be... this question clearly shows...

Kudos to above people...who are still justifying the answers :D
..
Dedication is what leads to success...
Join the discussion

by Tommy Wallach » Thu Jan 24, 2013 8:52 pm
Hey All,

Just to be sure an expert has weighed in on this.

This is a ridiculous question in every way. You don't say "In 1990's," you say "In the 1990's." And if you said that, you'd need a past tense verb, if this question was written after the 1990's, or a present perfect verb, if it was written during the 1990's (or a future tense verb, if it was written BEFORE the 1990's! those years are OVER). But the present tense verb "are"? Totally crazy wrong.

Ignore this question. Run for the hills. Screaming!

-t
Tommy Wallach, Company Expert
ManhattanGMAT

If you found this posting mega-helpful, feel free to thank and/or follow me!
Join the discussion