BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

In 1990 850 million movie tickets were sold in the United St

Expert replies
by vinni.k » Thu Jul 26, 2018 9:15 am

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

B

C

D

E

Stats

Difficulty—

In 1990 850 million movie tickets were sold in the United States. One fifth of those tickets were bought by people over the age of 50. Did people under the age of 20 buy more than 425 million movie tickets in 1990?

(1) In 1990, people under the age of 20 bought between two and three times as many tickets as were bought by people over the age of fifty.

(2) In 1990, people under the age of 20 spent $2.2 billion more on movie tickets than did people over the age of 50, with both groups spending an average (arithmetic mean) of $6 per ticket.

OA is B

Given : 170 million tickets bought by people over 50.
Question: People under age 20 buy > 425 million tickets ?

I have a doubt in B. So, here's my work:
Both groups spending an average of $6 per ticket. People under the age 20 spent a total of $2.2 billion on tickets. So,
2.2 Billion / $6 = (Approx) 366 million tickets. So, the answer is no, but s(2) is sufficient.

Total of 536.67 million tickets are bought, out of which 170 million are bought by people over 50 --> 536.67 - 170 = 366 million.

Please let me your analysis or correct me if i am wrong.

Thanks
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by vinni.k » Sat Jul 28, 2018 8:05 am
Any idea how to approach this question.

Please
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Sat Jul 28, 2018 10:54 am
vinni.k wrote:I have a doubt in B. So, here's my work:
Both groups spending an average of $6 per ticket. People under the age 20 spent a total of $2.2 billion on tickets. So,
2.2 Billion / $6 = (Approx) 366 million tickets. So, the answer is no, but s(2) is sufficient.
The statement in red does not accurately reflect the information in Statement 2.
Statement 2: People under the age of 20 spent $2.2 billion MORE on movie tickets than did people over the age of 50.
Here, the total amount spent by people under the age of 20 ≠ $2.2 billion.
The usage of MORE indicates that the total spent by people under the age of 20 was $2.2 billion GREATER than the total amount spent by people over the age of 50.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by vinni.k » Sun Jul 29, 2018 10:38 am
GMATGuruNY wrote: The statement in red does not accurately reflect the information in Statement 2.
Statement 2: People under the age of 20 spent $2.2 billion MORE on movie tickets than did people over the age of 50.
Here, the total amount spent by people under the age of 20 ≠ $2.2 billion.
The usage of MORE indicates that the total spent by people under the age of 20 was $2.2 billion GREATER than the total amount spent by people over the age of 50.
Thanks Mitch,

So, s(2) -->
Total spent by people over 50 = $6 * 170 million tickets = $1.02 Billion
Total spent by people under 20 = $1.02 Billion + $2.2 Billion = $3.22 Billion
$3.22 Billion/$6 = 536 million tickets
So s(2) is sufficient.
Join the discussion

by vinni.k » Fri Aug 03, 2018 12:19 pm
vinni.k wrote: So, s(2) -->
Total spent by people over 50 = $6 * 170 million tickets = $1.02 Billion
Total spent by people under 20 = $1.02 Billion + $2.2 Billion = $3.22 Billion
$3.22 Billion/$6 = 536 million tickets
So s(2) is sufficient.
Is this correct ?
Join the discussion