BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

In 1987, Fabrico, a clothing manufacturer, sold a total of 2

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorDC » Wed Nov 13, 2019 8:38 pm
In 1987, Fabrico, a clothing manufacturer, sold a total of 2.3 million dollars' worth of clothing, a 17 percent increase over 1986 sales. In January 1988, however, Fabrico closed one of its clothing factories, citing reduced demand for its products as the major reason. Which one of the following, if true about 1987, contributes most to a resolution of the apparent discrepancy between the sales figures and the reason offered for closing a factory?

(A) The total worldwide dollar value of clothing sales by manufacturers increased by 5 percent over sales in 1986.

(B) Fabrico's employees dropped earlier demands for a 25 percent increase in company-paid benefits and a 15 percent increase in hourly wages.

(C) Because of escalating costs for raw materials, prices charged by Fabrico for its products were on average 42 percent higher than they were in 1986.

(D) Fabrico introduced several new styles of clothing that were generally praised by fashion critics and that sold very well.

(E) Fabrico spent less on capital improvements than it did in 1986, when it added new plant capacity and new equipment.

OA C

Source: Veritas Prep
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by deloitte247 » Sat Nov 16, 2019 10:35 pm
Premise: In 1987, Fabrico, a clothing manufacturer, sold a total of 2.3 million dollars' worth of clothing, a 17 percent increase over 1986 sales.

Conclusion: In January 1988, Fabrico closed one of its clothing factories, citing reduced demand for its products as the major reason.

Option A - Incorrect:
We only know about the 17 percent increase over 1986 sales of Fabrico. The dollar value of clothing sales by manufacturers is not in harmony with the argument.

Option B - Incorrect:
In reference to the passage, no information was given about Fabrico's employees. There is no concrete basis to support this option.

Option C - Correct:
According to the passage, the cost of raw materials wasn't specified. Nevertheless, we don't know if the prices charged by Fabrico for its products was 42 percent higher than they were in 1986 because the prices charged by Fabrico was not stated.

Option D - Incorrect:
This claim is baseless because it wasn't stated in the passage that Fabrico introduced several new styles of clothing that were generally praised by fashion critics and solid very well.

Option E - Incorrect:
Neither do we know about the amount Fabrico spent on capital improvement nor the plant capacity and new equipment it added in 1986.
Join the discussion