BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

In 1984, almost 2 percent of humans who were admitted to hos

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorDC » Wed Aug 21, 2019 5:55 pm

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

B

C

D

E

Stats

Difficulty

In 1984, almost 2 percent of humans who were admitted to hospital emergency rooms after suffering a scorpion bite in the southwestern United States died from the attack. Ten years later, this figure had jumped to 4 percent. Clearly, the venom of the scorpion has become much more toxic to humans.

Which of the following statements, if true, most seriously weakens the above conclusion?

A) The scorpion population in the southwestern United States has remained steady since 1984.

B) There have been few innovations in the treatment of scorpion bites since 1984.

C) Most people who suffer scorpion bites are inexperienced hikers who are unaware of the best methods to avoid coming in contact with a scorpion.

D) Since 1984, people have learned that scorpion bites can be treated in the home as long as they are detected early.

E) People who survive one scorpion bite have a better than average chance of surviving a second bite.

OA D

Source: Princeton Review
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by deloitte247 » Fri Aug 23, 2019 9:58 am
We need to find what opposes the conclusion given in the argument.
Premise:
- 2 percent of people who suffered from scorpion bite died.
- it increased to 4 percent after 10 years.
Conclusion: The venom of the scorpion has become much more toxic.

OPTION A - INCORRECT
We are not concerned about the population of the scorpion since the year 1984

OPTION B - INCORRECT
If true, there is no indication in the argument to back this up.

OPTION C - INCORRECT
We are not interested in how hikers should avoid scorpions.

OPTION D - CORRECT
This opposes the conclusion that scorpions are now more venomous. It explains why there is an increase in the percentage of people who died from scorpion bite.

OPTION E - INCORRECT
This cannot explain how the percentage of people who died from the bite increased from 2% to 4% in 10 years.
Join the discussion