BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

In 1981, for the first time in over two decades, the average

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorDC » Thu Jun 14, 2018 11:29 pm

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

B

C

D

E

Stats

Difficulty

In 1981, for the first time in over two decades, the average scores of high school students on standardized math and English tests did not decline. During the same year, millions of American students enjoyed their first exposure to the new world of the microcomputer, whether in schools, video arcades, or other settings. The conclusion is clear: far from stultifying the intellectual capacities of students, exposure to computers can actually enhance them.

The most serious weakness of the argument above is its failure to

(A) discuss the underlying causes of the twenty-year decline in students’ test scores
(B) cite specific figures documenting the increases in test scores
(C) distinguish among the various types of computer being used by high school students
(D) define the intellectual capacities tested by the standardized math and English tests referred to
(E) explain exactly how high school students’ abilities on math and English tests could have been enhanced by exposure to computers
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by deloitte247 » Sun Jun 17, 2018 12:08 pm
Here, we have to pay maximum attention to the details in the argument so as to pick the best of the options.

In Option A - INCORRECT
In as much as the statement is morally advisory it is definitely a mere hearsay because from the statement above nothing can be said categorically as to the decline of academic capacities.

In Option B - INCORRECT.
If something has been reported not to have declined it doesn't translate it to increment. For instance it'd be a stagnant data specifically meaning no net increase or decrease. Citing figures here would not sway much.

In Option C - INCORRECT
How does the types of computers been used affect academic performances except in computer classes or tutorials? This is in fact a post of strength for us to see that computers are of necessities.

In Option D - INCORRECT.
''intellectual capacities'' cuts across all board and should not be at any point in time limited to segments. It also can be likened for the development of intelligence quotient.

In Option E - CORRECT.
We have a case of identifying with how exactly the non decline in scores gotten from Math and English influences students abilities and how computer education exposes them. This is the detail needed.
Join the discussion

by Krabhay » Tue Dec 18, 2018 9:33 pm
a. Statement 'a' is a contradiction to the passage as the scores of students have not declined.So, there are no causes for the decline.
b. It is also not mentioned that the scores have increased over the period. Hence, b could also not be a weakness.
c. Irrelevant to the argument.
d. Failure to define intellectual capacities tested doesn't hold any relevance to the argument made in the passage.
e. This is the major weakness of the argument as the author has mentioned that the exposure to computers has enhanced students ability and have not provided any link between the exposure to computers and the performance.
Hence, e is the answer.
Join the discussion