BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

In 1975, the number of automobile related deaths among young people ages 16-21 was about 10,000. In 2000, this number

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorDC » Thu Apr 02, 2020 5:46 pm

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

B

C

D

E

Stats

Difficulty

In 1975, the number of automobile related deaths among young people ages 16-21 was about 10,000. In 2000, this number was closer to 40,000. Clearly, today's young people drive much more recklessly and are more accident prone than were those in 1975.

Which of the following statements, if true, would most weaken the argument made above?

A) There were fewer traffic laws and regulations in 1975 compared with those in 2000.
B) Between 1975 and 2000, the number of licensed teenagers in the country more than quadrupled.
C) Surveys show that young drivers tend to drive more recklessly when there are other passengers of the same age riding in the car.
D) Improvements to automobile safety technology have significantly reduced the chances of being killed in an automobile accident.
E) According to insurance data, senior citizens, not teenagers, had the highest per-driver accident rate in 2000.


OA B

Source: Veritas Prep
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Premise: In 1975, the number of automobile related deaths among young people ages 16-21 was about 10,000.

Conclusion: Clearly, today's young people drive much more recklessly and are more accident-prone than were those in 1975.

Option A - Incorrect:
This option is wrong because traffic laws do not have any relation to the reckless driving of young drivers.

Option B - Correct:
From the passage argument, the number of young people involved in accident in 1975 was 10, 000 and this number increased to 40,000 in 2000. This argument only focuses on the raw number of accidents that occurred and assumed that the number of young teenagers driving is constant.

So, going by option B, if the number of licensed teenagers in 1975 is represented by X and that of 2000 represented by 4x (i.e more than quadrupled), this implies that the rate of accident (i.e from 10,000 to 40,000) only increased by 4 times that of 1975 and thus means that driving has become safer. Hence, this option is correct.

Option C - Incorrect:
This option is out of scope because it has no relevance to the comparison of teenagers driving habits in 1975 and 2000.

Option D - Incorrect:
Well, the improvement of technology will lead to fewer accidents. Therefore, this option strengthens the argument.

Option E - Incorrect:
This option is out of context
Join the discussion