BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

If x is a prime number, what is the value of x

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by crackverbal » Wed Oct 12, 2016 2:35 am
Hi Needgmat,

When it comes to number theory questions the best approach is to think of using numbers instead of algebra. While using numbers make sure to test for different types of numbers (positives, negatives, fractions and zero).

In this question plugging in numbers is the fastest approach since we have a constraint that x has to be prime. Also keep in mind that this is a value DS problem, so for a statement or both statements to be sufficient they have to give us one unique answer.

Statement 1 : 2x + 2 is a cube of an integer

Now 2x + 2 can be 8, 27, 64, 125, 216..., but since x has to be prime x

2x + 2 = 8 ; x = 3
2x + 2 = 64 ; x = 31
2x + 2 = 216 ; x = 107

We cannot use 2x + 2 as 27 and 125 because in these cases we cannot have x as prime (x will not be an integer)

So x = 3 or 31 or 107. Since this is not one definite answer, statement 1 is insufficient.

Statement 2 : The average of x consecutive integers is an integer

This statement is easy to evaluate as x here can be any prime number like 3, 5, 7, 31..... However there is something you can take back from this statement.

'The average of odd number of consecutive integers will always be an integer' and 'The average of an even number of consecutive numbers will never be an integer'.

So the statement here just tells us that x is odd. Insufficient.

Now combining the two statements also does not yield a definite answer as x can be any prime out of 3, 31, 107.... Insufficient.

Hope this helps!

CrackVerbal Academics Team
Join Free 4 part MBA Through GMAT Video Training Series here -
https://gmat.crackverbal.com/mba-throug ... video-2018

Enroll for our GMAT Trial Course here -
https://gmatonline.crackverbal.com/

For more info on GMAT and MBA, follow us on @AskCrackVerbal
Join the discussion

by Needgmat » Wed Oct 12, 2016 6:36 am

When it comes to number theory questions the best approach is to think of using numbers instead of algebra. While using numbers make sure to test for different types of numbers (positives, negatives, fractions and zero).

In this question plugging in numbers is the fastest approach since we have a constraint that x has to be prime. Also keep in mind that this is a value DS problem, so for a statement or both statements to be sufficient they have to give us one unique answer.

Statement 1 : 2x + 2 is a cube of an integer

Now 2x + 2 can be 8, 27, 64, 125, 216..., but since x has to be prime x

2x + 2 = 8 ; x = 3
2x + 2 = 64 ; x = 31
2x + 2 = 216 ; x = 107

We cannot use 2x + 2 as 27 and 125 because in these cases we cannot have x as prime (x will not be an integer)

So x = 3 or 31 or 107. Since this is not one definite answer, statement 1 is insufficient.

Statement 2 : The average of x consecutive integers is an integer

This statement is easy to evaluate as x here can be any prime number like 3, 5, 7, 31..... However there is something you can take back from this statement.

'The average of odd number of consecutive integers will always be an integer' and 'The average of an even number of consecutive numbers will never be an integer'.

So the statement here just tells us that x is odd. Insufficient.

Now combining the two statements also does not yield a definite answer as x can be any prime out of 3, 31, 107.... Insufficient.

Hope this helps!
CrackVerbal Academics Team
Hi CrackVerbal ,

Thank you so much for your explanation. It really helps.

Thanks,

Kavin
Join the discussion

by fiza gupta » Fri Oct 14, 2016 7:17 am
given x is a prime number

(1) 2x+2 cube root of an integer
let x=3 =2*3 + 2 = 8(cube root of 2)
let x=31 =2*31 + 2= 64(cube root of 4)
NOT SUFFICIENT

(2) average of consecutive x terms is an integer
average=(x+1)/2
x = 3 , average = 2
x = 31, average = 16
NOT SUFFICIENT

combining
it can be either 3 or 31 or more numbers
NOT SUFFICIENT

SO E
Fiza Gupta
Join the discussion