BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

If x is a positive integer, is sqrt(x) an integer?

Expert replies
by Rospino » Mon Mar 31, 2014 4:47 pm
If x is a positive integer, is sqrt(x) an integer?
(1) sqrt(4x) is an integer
(2) sqrt(3x) is not an integer

OA: A

I used the plug in number approach. However, this problem took me about 3.5 mins - 1.5 mins too long. Any quicker ways?
(1) sqrt(4x) is an integer
a. if x = 1, then sqrt(4x) = 2, then sqrt(x) = 1, which is an integer.
b. if x = 4, then sqrt(4x) = 4, then sqrt(x) = 2, which is an integer.
c. if x = 9, then sqrt(4x) = 6, then sqrt(x) = 3, which is an integer.

Sufficient. Eliminate [spoiler]BCE; AD[/spoiler]Remains.

(2) sqrt(3x) is not an integer
a. if x = 2, then sqrt(3x) = sqrt(6), then sqrt(x) = sqrt(2), which is not an integer.
b. if x = 4, then sqrt(3x) = sqrt(12), then sqrt(x) = sqrt(4), which is an integer.

Insufficient. Eliminate D
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Mon Mar 31, 2014 4:53 pm
Rospino wrote:If x is a positive integer, is √x an integer?
(1) √(4x) is an integer
(2) √(3x) is not an integer

Target question: Is √x an integer?

Given: x is a positive integer

Statement 1: √(4x) is an integer
IMPORTANT CONCEPT: If K is an integer, then √K will be an integer if the prime factorization of K has an even number of each prime.
Some examples:
√144 = 12 (integer), and 144 = (2)(2)(2)(2)(3)(3) [four 2's and two 3's]
√1600 = 40 (integer), and 1600 = (2)(2)(2)(2)(2)(2)(5)(5) [six 2's and two 5's]
√441 = 21 (integer), and 441 = (3)(3)(7)(7)[two 3's and two 7's]
√12 = some non-integer, and 12 = (2)(2)(3)[two 2's and one 3's]

So, if √(4x) is an integer, then the prime factorization of 4x has an even number of each prime.
Since 4x = (2)(2)(x) we can see that the prime factorization of x must have an even number of each prime.
If the prime factorization of x has an even number of each prime, then √x must be an integer.
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: √(3x) is not an integer.
There are several values of x that meet this condition. Here are two:
Case a: x = 4. This means that √(3x) = √12, which is not an integer. In this case, √x is an integer.
Case b: x = 5. This means that √(3x) = √15, which is not an integer. In this case, √x is not an integer.
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Answer = A

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by Rospino » Mon Mar 31, 2014 5:04 pm
Brent,

Thank you very much for the explanation. It was very clear. Also, the concept you mentioned will definitely save me time on the exam.
IMPORTANT CONCEPT: If K is an integer, then √K will be an integer if the prime factorization of K has an even number of each prime.
Regards,
Ricardo
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Mon Mar 31, 2014 5:05 pm
You're welcome.
It's a frequently-tested concept, so good to know.

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by Amrabdelnaby » Sun Nov 22, 2015 2:00 pm
Brent,

Question though!

Now √4x is equal to 2√x, so if √x yields to 1.5 or 2.5 or 3.5 etc... √4x or 2√x will be always an integer.

so how come this statement is sufficient?

why did we assume that √x must be an integer if √4x is an integer although √4x =2√x
Brent@GMATPrepNow wrote:
Rospino wrote:If x is a positive integer, is √x an integer?
(1) √(4x) is an integer
(2) √(3x) is not an integer

Target question: Is √x an integer?

Given: x is a positive integer

Statement 1: √(4x) is an integer
IMPORTANT CONCEPT: If K is an integer, then √K will be an integer if the prime factorization of K has an even number of each prime.
Some examples:
√144 = 12 (integer), and 144 = (2)(2)(2)(2)(3)(3) [four 2's and two 3's]
√1600 = 40 (integer), and 1600 = (2)(2)(2)(2)(2)(2)(5)(5) [six 2's and two 5's]
√441 = 21 (integer), and 441 = (3)(3)(7)(7)[two 3's and two 7's]
√12 = some non-integer, and 12 = (2)(2)(3)[two 2's and one 3's]

So, if √(4x) is an integer, then the prime factorization of 4x has an even number of each prime.
Since 4x = (2)(2)(x) we can see that the prime factorization of x must have an even number of each prime.
If the prime factorization of x has an even number of each prime, then √x must be an integer.
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: √(3x) is not an integer.
There are several values of x that meet this condition. Here are two:
Case a: x = 4. This means that √(3x) = √12, which is not an integer. In this case, √x is an integer.
Case b: x = 5. This means that √(3x) = √15, which is not an integer. In this case, √x is not an integer.
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Answer = A

Cheers,
Brent
Join the discussion

by theCEO » Sun Nov 22, 2015 2:31 pm
Now √4x is equal to 2√x, so if √x yields to 1.5 or 2.5 or 3.5 etc... √4x or 2√x will be always an integer.

so how come this statement is sufficient?

why did we assume that √x must be an integer if √4x is an integer although √4x =2√x
Brent@GMATPrepNow wrote:
Rospino wrote:If x is a positive integer, is √x an integer?
(1) √(4x) is an integer
(2) √(3x) is not an integer

Hi Amrabdelnaby,

I am not Brent :) but let's adress this statement: "Now √4x is equal to 2√x, so if √x yields to 1.5 or 2.5 or 3.5 etc... √4x or 2√x will be always an integer."

If √x = 1.5
x = (1.5)^2 = 2.25

The prompt tells us that x is a positive number: therefore x could never be 2.25 or any non-integer
Join the discussion

by Amrabdelnaby » Sun Nov 22, 2015 2:38 pm
Oh my!

I missed that part of the question!

what a shame :)

I totally agree with you CEO.. if x itself is an +ve integer and √4x is also an integer then √x must be an integer because x must contain an even number of prime factors in this case, since we eliminated the possibility of x being a fraction.

I see what you are saying now.

Thanks man :)
theCEO wrote:Now √4x is equal to 2√x, so if √x yields to 1.5 or 2.5 or 3.5 etc... √4x or 2√x will be always an integer.

so how come this statement is sufficient?

why did we assume that √x must be an integer if √4x is an integer although √4x =2√x
Brent@GMATPrepNow wrote:
Rospino wrote:If x is a positive integer, is √x an integer?
(1) √(4x) is an integer
(2) √(3x) is not an integer

Hi Amrabdelnaby,

I am not Brent :) but let's adress this statement: "Now √4x is equal to 2√x, so if √x yields to 1.5 or 2.5 or 3.5 etc... √4x or 2√x will be always an integer."

If √x = 1.5
x = (1.5)^2 = 2.25

The prompt tells us that x is a positive number: therefore x could never be 2.25 or any non-integer
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Sun Nov 22, 2015 2:38 pm
Amrabdelnaby wrote:Brent,

Question though!

Now √4x is equal to 2√x, so if √x yields to 1.5 or 2.5 or 3.5 etc... √4x or 2√x will be always an integer.

so how come this statement is sufficient?

why did we assume that √x must be an integer if √4x is an integer although √4x =2√x
√x CAN NEVER equal something.5
If √x WERE to equal something.5, then x = (something.5)² = somenumber.25
Here we have a contradiction, because the given information that says x is an INTEGER, and an integer cannot end in .25

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by Matt@VeritasPrep » Fri Nov 27, 2015 1:35 am
An algebraic way of seeing this:

Suppose that √x = m + .5, where x and m are integers.

Squaring both sides, we have

x = m² + m + .25

But this says x = (integer)² + (integer) + .25, a contradiction. Hence x and m cannot both be integers.
Join the discussion

Rospino wrote:
Mon Mar 31, 2014 4:47 pm
If x is a positive integer, is sqrt(x) an integer?
(1) sqrt(4x) is an integer
(2) sqrt(3x) is not an integer

OA: A

Solution:

Question Stem Analysis:


We need to determine whether √x is an integer, given that x is a positive integer. Notice that √x is an integer if x is a perfect square.

Statement One Alone:

Since √(4x) = 2√x is an integer, √x is either itself an integer or it is 1/2 of some integer. If √x is the former case, we are done. If √x is the latter case, we can let √x = k/2 where k is some positive integer. Squaring both sides, we have:

x = k^2/4

Since x is a positive integer, we see that k has to be even. If k is even, then k/2, or √x, will be an integer. Statement one alone is sufficient.

Statement Two Alone:

Statement two is not sufficient. For example, if x = 4, then √x = 2 is an integer (notice that √(3x) = √12 is not an integer). However, if x = 5, then √x = √5 is not integer (notice that √(3x) = √15 is also not an integer). Statement two alone is not sufficient.

Answer: A

Scott Woodbury-Stewart
Founder and CEO
[email protected]

Image

See why Target Test Prep is rated 5 out of 5 stars on BEAT the GMAT. Read our reviews

ImageImage
Join the discussion