BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

If X and Y are prime integers , what is X + Y ?

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by apuso » Sun Jan 24, 2010 9:16 am
looking at option a) X-Y is a prime integer
it gives multiple sets of values for x & y which satisfy the above condition, ex: x=5, y=2 or x=7,y=5 or x=5, y=3 etc, thus this is NOT SUFFICIENT

looking at option b)Y<X<6
this also gives multiple sets of true values, ex: x=5, y=2 or x=5, y=3, thus this is NOT SUFFICIENT too

so ans is E
Join the discussion

by papgust » Sun Jan 24, 2010 8:51 pm
This can be solved by just plugging in simple numbers.

X+Y?

A. X-Y is a prime integer

5-2 = 3 (Prime). 5+2 = 7
7-5 = 2 (Prime). 7+5 = 12

Two or more different answers. Insufficient.

B. Y<X<6

Y and X could be any of 2,3, or 5.
If X=5, Y=2, then 5+2 = 7
If X=5, Y=3, then 5+3 = 8

Two different answers. Insufficient.

Combined,
Clearly insufficient from numbers tried in A and B.
Join the discussion

by bhumika.k.shah » Sun Jan 24, 2010 10:27 pm
I agree. its E
but had the second statement said that Y<X<6 and X and Y are both odd...the answer option would have been C right ?

I think it would be B as the only two prime #s less than 6 that are odd are 3 and 5

So then IMO B would be sufficient - am i right??
Join the discussion

by linkinpark » Mon Jan 25, 2010 7:56 am
bhumika.k.shah wrote:I agree. its E
but had the second statement said that Y<X<6 and X and Y are both odd...the answer option would have been C right ?

I think it would be B as the only two prime #s less than 6 that are odd are 3 and 5

So then IMO B would be sufficient - am i right??
2 is also a prime
530->480->580
when posting a question don't post OA(even masked) before some discussion.
Join the discussion

by bhumika.k.shah » Mon Jan 25, 2010 8:57 am
yes linkinpark
2 is also prime . but had the same question been asked with the 2nd statement modified to Y<X<6 and X and Y are both odd... then all i wanna know is whether B alone would be sufficient ?

in this case 2 is a prime # but not an even prime #

Thanks! :D
Join the discussion

by linkinpark » Mon Jan 25, 2010 9:00 am
if x and y were mentioned to be odd integers in B then yes B would have been sufficient definitely. sorry didn't read first clearly.
530->480->580
when posting a question don't post OA(even masked) before some discussion.
Join the discussion

by bhumika.k.shah » Mon Jan 25, 2010 9:10 am
its cool :)
Join the discussion