BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

If r, s, and w are positive numbers such that x = 60r + 80s

Expert replies
by II » Sun Jul 13, 2008 2:59 pm
If r, s, and w are positive numbers such that x = 60r + 80s and r + s = 1, is x < 70 ?

(1) r > 0.5

(2) r > s

I got this question correct by plugging-in numbers, but wanted to learn ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES to answer this.
Also what do you think the question is trying to test here ?

My approach:
Start with statement 1 -> let r = 0.6 and s must therefore be 0.4. Plug this back into 60r + 80s = 68. This answers YES to the question "is x < 70?".
Test with r=0.5 and s=0.5, we can see that x=70. So can safely say that if r>0.5 then x<70

Statement 2:
If r > s, then r must be greater than 0.5 (since r + s = 1). We can use the same logic as in statement 1 here. SUFFICIENT.

Answer D.

Thanks in advance.
II
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Ian Stewart » Sun Jul 13, 2008 4:01 pm
The equation just represents a weighted average. If r > 0.5, the value will be closer to 60 than to 80.

Think about the equation you'd set up to solve this problem: peanuts cost $60/pound, and cashews cost $80/pound. If a mixture is r% peanuts and s% cashews, what is the cost per pound of the mixture? If you ignore the 100s we need to introduce when dealing with percentages, you should get the same equation as in the question. Clearly if the mixture is more than half peanuts, it will cost less than $70/pound. Each statement tells us that.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion

by ramyaravindran » Mon Jul 14, 2008 9:03 am
Not sure if I am incorrect in assuming r to be 0.9 and s to be 0.1. In this case x>72. So, why is the official Answer D. Should it not be E?. Can someone explain?
Join the discussion

by Ian Stewart » Mon Jul 14, 2008 9:15 am
ramyaravindran wrote:Not sure if I am incorrect in assuming r to be 0.9 and s to be 0.1. In this case x>72. So, why is the official Answer D. Should it not be E?. Can someone explain?
You might have made a small arithmetic mistake. If r = 0.9 and s = 0.1, then:

x = 60r + 80s = 60*0.9 + 80*0.1 = 54 + 8 = 62
Join the discussion

by ramyaravindran » Mon Jul 14, 2008 9:28 am
Thanks for the explanation.
Join the discussion

by II » Mon Jul 14, 2008 1:10 pm
Also note: one of the most effective ways of solving GMAT inequality problems is to focus on the EXTREME VALUES of a given inequality. This is particularly helpful when solving problems that involve multiple inequalities.


Here we can plug-in extreme values for the r and s inequalities. We know that r must be greater than 0.5 and s must be less than 0.5:
- 60 * (greater than 0.5) = greater than 30
- 80 * (less than 0.5) = less than 40
- So (greater than 30) + (less than 40) = less than 70.
Join the discussion

WAT IS WRONG HERE?

by rajaram19 » Thu Aug 20, 2009 1:37 pm
w = 60r + 80s ---1
r + s = 1 --2

3--->60r + 60s = 60 adding 1 + 3

w-20s = 60 since there is no 'r' here .Shud E be the answer??wat is the wrong thing i am doin?/plss explain someone
Join the discussion

by adi_800 » Wed Oct 12, 2011 10:17 am
w = 60r + 80s
w = 60r + 60s + 20s
r + s = 1
60r + 60s = 60
Hence, w = 60 + 20s.. Is w < 70 => Is 60 + 2s < 70 => 2s < 10 => Is s < 0.5 ?

Statement 1 -> r > 0.5 => s < 0.5 -> Ans to question is sufficient
Statement 2 -> r > s => Sufficient !!
Join the discussion

by parul9 » Wed Oct 12, 2011 10:25 am
It is D!
I followed adi_800's method!
Join the discussion

II wrote:
Sun Jul 13, 2008 2:59 pm
If r, s, and w are positive numbers such that x = 60r + 80s and r + s = 1, is x < 70 ?

(1) r > 0.5
(2) r > s
Given: r, s, and w are positive numbers such that w = 60r + 80s and r + s = 1

Target question: w < 70
STRATEGY: Always be on the lookout for opportunities to rephrase the target question. In many cases, a little work up front will make analyzing the statements much easier.

Since we're told that r + s = 1, we might recognize that we can manipulate the equation w = 60r + 80s to take advantage of this information.
We can write: w = (60r + 60s) + 20s
Then factor the first part to get: w = 60(r + s) + 20s
Substitute to get: w = 60(1) + 20s
In other words: w = 60 + 20s, which means the target question becomes: Is 60 + 20s < 70?
We can make things even easier by subtracting 60 from both sides to get: Is 20s < 10?
And we can divide both sides by 20 to get: Is s < 0.5?
REPHRASED target question Is s < 0.5?

Aside: Here’s a video with tips on rephrasing the target question: https://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat- ... cy?id=1100

Statement 1: r > 0.5
We already know that r + s = 1
So, for example, if r = 0.5, then s = 0.5
Similarly, if r > 0.5, we can be certain that s < 0.5
In other words, the answer to the REPHRASED target question is YES, s is less than 0.5
Statement 1 is SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: r > s
If r + s = 1, we can subtract s from both sides to get: r = 1 - s
Now take statement 2 and replace r with 1 - s to get: 1 - s > s
From here, we can add s do both sides of the inequality to get: 1 > 2s
Divide both sides by 2 to get: 0.5 > s
Once again, the answer to the REPHRASED target question is YES, s is less than 0.5
Statement 2 is SUFFICIENT

Answer: D
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion