Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

If mn ≠ 0, is m > n? (1) 1/m < 1/n (2) m^2 > n^2

Expert replies
by hazelnut01 » Mon May 22, 2017 7:20 am
If mn ≠ 0, is m > n?

(1) 1/m < 1/n
(2) m^2 > n^2

Source : Manhattan Prep
OA=E
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Mon May 22, 2017 7:48 am
Something weird occurred.
Last edited by Brent@GMATPrepNow on Mon May 22, 2017 7:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Mon May 22, 2017 7:49 am
hazelnut01 wrote:If mn ≠ 0, is m > n?

(1) 1/m < 1/n
(2) m² > n²
Target question: Is m > n?

Given: mn ≠ 0

Statement 1: 1/m < 1/n
This statement doesn't FEEL sufficient, so I'll TEST some values.
There are several values of m and n that satisfy statement 1. Here are two:
Case a: m = 2 and n = 1. In this case m > n
Case b: m = -3 and n = 1. In this case m < n
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Aside: For more on this idea of plugging in values when a statement doesn't feel sufficient, read my article: https://www.gmatprepnow.com/articles/dat ... lug-values

Statement 2: m² > n²
Before I start choosing numbers to test, I'll see if I can REUSE my numbers from statement 1.
Yes I can! Those same values satisfy the conditions in statement 2.
Case a: m = 2 and n = 1. In this case m > n
Case b: m = -3 and n = 1. In this case m < n
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statements 1 and 2 combined
IMPORTANT: Notice that I was able to use the same counter-examples to show that each statement ALONE is not sufficient. So, the same counter-examples will satisfy the two statements COMBINED.
In other words,
Case a: m = 2 and n = 1. In this case m > n
Case b: m = -3 and n = 1. In this case m < n
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, the combined statements are NOT SUFFICIENT

Answer: E

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by Bullzi » Fri May 26, 2017 11:49 pm
Hello,
Is there an algebraic way of solving this question? I didn't think of testing values, started with algebra, but got stuck midway not able to reach a logical conclusion

Thanks,
Bullzi
Join the discussion

by DavidG@VeritasPrep » Sat May 27, 2017 7:51 am
Bullzi wrote:Hello,
Is there an algebraic way of solving this question? I didn't think of testing values, started with algebra, but got stuck midway not able to reach a logical conclusion

Thanks,
Bullzi
You can do algebra with some logical reasoning mixed in.

If we're given an inequality, and we take the reciprocal of both sides, the inequality sign will flip, provided that both sides are positive or both sides are negative. If other words, if A > B, and A and B are both positive (or both negative), then 1/A < 1/B. However, one side is positive and one side is negative, the inequality sign will not flip when we take the reciprocal. (This makes sense, as the reciprocal of a negative will remain negative.)

Using that property, here's one way to evaluate statement 1.
If m and n are both positive, or both negative, then when we take the reciprocal of 1/m > 1/n, we'll get m > n, or a YES to the original question. However, if m is negative and n is positive, the reciprocal would give us m < n, or a NO. Not sufficient.

Statement 2. If we take the square root of both sides of m² > n² , we'll get |m| > |n|. All this tells us is that the distance from m to 0 is greater than the distance from n to 0. But it doesn't tell us if we're dealing with positive or negative values. If m and n are positive, yes, m will be greater. But if m is negative and n is positive, then clearly m will be not be greater.

Together: Same problem. If m is negative and n is positive, then, m < n, and we get a NO. If both are positive, then m > n and we get a YES. Not sufficient. So the answer is E.
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Sat May 27, 2017 9:25 am
Bullzi wrote:Hello,
Is there an algebraic way of solving this question? I didn't think of testing values, started with algebra, but got stuck midway not able to reach a logical conclusion

Thanks,
Bullzi
Question stem, rephrased:
Is m-n > 0?

Statement 1: 1/m < 1/n
1/m - 1/n < 0
(n-m)/mn < 0
(m-n)/mn > 0.
Case 1: mn>0
Here, the inequality in blue will be satisfied only if m-n>0, with the result that the answer to the question stem is YES.
Case 2: mn<0
Here, the inequality in blue will be satisfied only if m-n<0, with the result that the answer to the question stem is NO.
INSUFFICIENT.

Statement 2: m² > n²
m² - n² > 0
(m+n)(m-n) > 0.
Case 1: m+n > 0
Here, the inequality in red will be satisfied only if m-n > 0, with the result that the answer to the question stem is YES.
Case 2: m+n<0
Here, the inequality in red will be satisfied only if m-n<0, with the result that the answer to the question stem is NO.
INSUFFICIENT.

Statements combined:
(m-n)/mn > 0.
(m+n)(m-n) > 0.
Case 1: mn>0 and m+n>0
Here, the two colored inequalities will be satisfied only if m-n>0, with the result that the answer to the question stem is YES.
Case 2: mn<0 and m+n<0
Here, the two colored inequalities will be satisfied only if m-n<0, with the result that the answer to the question stem is NO.
INSUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is E.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion