BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

If Max can complete a job in 4 hours and Nick can complete

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorLU » Wed Oct 03, 2018 2:38 pm

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

B

C

D

E

Stats

Difficulty—

Source: Princeton Review

If Max can complete a job in 4 hours and Nick can complete the same job in 6 hours, how many fewer hours do Max and Nick working together need to complete the job than Max alone needs to complete the job?

A. 1.6
B. 2.4
C. 3.2
D. 3.4
E. 5.0

The OA is A.
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by [email protected] » Wed Oct 03, 2018 4:22 pm
Hi All,

We're told that Max can complete a job in 4 hours and Nick can complete the same job in 6 hours. We're asked how many FEWER hours it would take Max and Nick working together to complete the job than Max alone needs to complete the job. This question can be solved in a couple of different ways, including with the Work Formula.

Work = (A)(B)/(A+B) where A and B are the two times the individuals take to complete the job alone.

With Max's time of 4 hours and Nick's time of 6 hours, working together, it would take them...

(4)(6)/(4+6) = 24/10 = 2.4 hours to complete the job

The difference between Max's time and 'combined' time is 4 - 2.4 = 1.6 hours.

Final Answer: A

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image
Join the discussion

by Scott@TargetTestPrep » Thu Oct 04, 2018 6:32 pm
BTGmoderatorLU wrote:Source: Princeton Review

If Max can complete a job in 4 hours and Nick can complete the same job in 6 hours, how many fewer hours do Max and Nick working together need to complete the job than Max alone needs to complete the job?

A. 1.6
B. 2.4
C. 3.2
D. 3.4
E. 5.0
The combined rate for Max and Nick is:

1/4 + 1/6 = 3/12 + 2/12 = 5/12, so the time needed to completed the job together is 12/5 = 2.4 hours.

So it takes 4 - 2.4 = 1.6 hours less when they complete the job together than if Max were to complete the job alone.

Answer: A

Scott Woodbury-Stewart
Founder and CEO
[email protected]

Image

See why Target Test Prep is rated 5 out of 5 stars on BEAT the GMAT. Read our reviews

ImageImage
Join the discussion