BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

If 56<x<66, where x is an integer. x=?

Expert replies
by The Jock » Fri Sep 03, 2010 2:42 am
I am not sure about the source of this question, just saw it somewhere and tried to solve:

If 56<x<66, where x is an integer. x=?

1). When x is divided by 2, the remainder is 1
2). x+1 is divisible by 3.

Stmt 1) When x is divided by 2, the remainder is 1 -> x can be any odd number between 56-66.
such as, 57, 59, 61, 63, 65 so it is Insufficient

Stmt 2) x+1 is divisible by 3 -> x+1 could be 57, 60, 63. SO it is Insufficient
Combining (1) and (2) we get that x can be 59
So answer should be C

Please confirm if I am doing it right, because OA(No official source, so it could be wrong) is different.
Thanks and Regards,
Varun
https://mbayogi.wordpress.com/
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Rahul@gurome » Fri Sep 03, 2010 2:48 am
The Jock wrote:I am not sure about the source of this question, just saw it somewhere and tried to solve:

If 56<x<66, where x is an integer. x=?

1). When x is divided by 2, the remainder is 1
2). x+1 is divisible by 3.

Stmt 1) When x is divided by 2, the remainder is 1 -> x can be any odd number between 56-66.
such as, 57, 59, 61, 63, 65 so it is Insufficient

Stmt 2) x+1 is divisible by 3 -> x+1 could be 57, 60, 63. SO it is Insufficient
Combining (1) and (2) we get that x can be 59
So answer should be C

Please confirm if I am doing it right, because OA(No official source, so it could be wrong) is different.
You are right Varun! The correct answer is (C).
Rahul Lakhani
Quant Expert
Gurome, Inc.
https://www.GuroMe.com
On MBA sabbatical (at ISB) for 2011-12 - will stay active as time permits
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
+91-99201 32411 (India)
Join the discussion

by The Jock » Fri Sep 03, 2010 3:05 am
Thanks a lot Rahul.
Thanks and Regards,
Varun
https://mbayogi.wordpress.com/
Join the discussion

by Rahul@gurome » Fri Sep 03, 2010 3:08 am
The Jock wrote:Thanks a lot Rahul.
You are welcome!
Rahul Lakhani
Quant Expert
Gurome, Inc.
https://www.GuroMe.com
On MBA sabbatical (at ISB) for 2011-12 - will stay active as time permits
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
+91-99201 32411 (India)
Join the discussion

by sk818020 » Fri Sep 03, 2010 4:14 am
OA is E?

The reason I think so is because;

1) Tells us x must be odd. So x could = 57, 59, 61, 63, or 65. Obviously insufficient.

2) Tells us that x plus 1 is divisible by three. So, x must be 1 less than nubmers divisible by 3. You could also rephrase this to say that when x is divided by three there is a remainder of 1.

The numbers divisible by three close to the range in this set are, 57, 60, 63, 66. Therefore x could equal, 59, 62, 65. Obviously insufficient.

Put them together and X could equal 59, or 65. Thus, together they are insufficient, E.

Is this the answer your book gave you?

THanks,

Jared
Join the discussion

by Rahul@gurome » Fri Sep 03, 2010 4:41 am
sk818020 wrote:OA is E?

The reason I think so is because;

1) Tells us x must be odd. So x could = 57, 59, 61, 63, or 65. Obviously insufficient.

2) Tells us that x plus 1 is divisible by three. So, x must be 1 less than nubmers divisible by 3. You could also rephrase this to say that when x is divided by three there is a remainder of 1.

The numbers divisible by three close to the range in this set are, 57, 60, 63, 66. Therefore x could equal, 59, 62, 65. Obviously insufficient.

Put them together and X could equal 59, or 65. Thus, together they are insufficient, E.

Is this the answer your book gave you?

THanks,

Jared
That's a good catch Jared. Possible value of x could also be 65 and then we don't get a unique answer.
The correct answer should be [spoiler](E)[/spoiler].
Rahul Lakhani
Quant Expert
Gurome, Inc.
https://www.GuroMe.com
On MBA sabbatical (at ISB) for 2011-12 - will stay active as time permits
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
+91-99201 32411 (India)
Join the discussion

by Gurpinder » Fri Sep 03, 2010 8:53 am
The answer is clearly (e).

However, isn't this a bad question though?

Stmt 1 suggests x = odd.
Stmt 2 suggests x = even

Aren't the two statements suppose to be consistent?
"Do not confuse motion and progress. A rocking horse keeps moving but does not make any progress."
- Alfred A. Montapert, Philosopher.
Join the discussion

by The Jock » Fri Sep 03, 2010 8:56 am
Yes the given answer is E.
Thanks and Regards,
Varun
https://mbayogi.wordpress.com/
Join the discussion

by sk818020 » Fri Sep 03, 2010 9:01 am
Gurpinder wrote:The answer is clearly (e).

However, isn't this a bad question though?

Stmt 1 suggests x = odd.
Stmt 2 suggests x = even

Aren't the two statements suppose to be consistent?
Statement 1 definetly indicates that x must be an odd number. But statemnt two does not. Statement 2 merely says that if you add 1 to x then it is divisible by 3. For example, 2,5,8,11... Any of those numbers are divisible by 3 if you add 1 to it. In the context of this question, statement 2 indicates that x can be 59,62, or 65. Thus, x could be odd or even.

Hope this helps.

Thanks,

Jared
Join the discussion

by Gurpinder » Fri Sep 03, 2010 9:06 am
sk818020 wrote:
Gurpinder wrote:The answer is clearly (e).

However, isn't this a bad question though?

Stmt 1 suggests x = odd.
Stmt 2 suggests x = even

Aren't the two statements suppose to be consistent?
Statement 1 definetly indicates that x must be an odd number. But statemnt two does not. Statement 2 merely says that if you add 1 to x then it is divisible by 3. For example, 2,5,8,11... Any of those numbers are divisible by 3 if you add 1 to it. In the context of this question, statement 2 indicates that x can be 59,62, or 65. Thus, x could be odd or even.

Hope this helps.

Thanks,

Jared
True!
"Do not confuse motion and progress. A rocking horse keeps moving but does not make any progress."
- Alfred A. Montapert, Philosopher.
Join the discussion