BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

If 2/5 of the students at College C (GMATPrep)

Expert replies
by freshy » Mon Aug 10, 2009 9:37 pm
If 2/5 of the students at College C are business majors, what is the number of female students at College C?

1) 2/5 of the male students at College C are business majors.
2) 200 of the female students at College C are business majors.

OA: C



Would anyone please explain?

I answer B because I thought that:

From the info:
2/5 * (total) = business major
total = M + F
2/5 * (M + F) = business major
2/5*M + 2/5*F = business major

1) 2/5*M are business major (I thought we already know that from the information given)

2) 2/5*F = 200 so F = 500

That's why I thought statement 2 alone is sufficient....would anyone please explain at which point I was wrong???

Appreciate all the help!
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by tohellandback » Mon Aug 10, 2009 9:45 pm
you are right!!
just one mistake..
you combined the information you got from the statement 1 with the information from 2.
and thats why the answer should be C.

2/5*M are business major-- thats not from the question stem. thats from statement 1.
The powers of two are bloody impolite!!
Join the discussion

by georgeung » Tue Aug 11, 2009 1:59 pm
Can you not simplify the problem as Freshy had done?

I understand what he had done by believing he already had data 1, but I want to say that kind of simplification cannot be done and I'm hoping someone can explain it to me.

That was pretty slick how you did that, Freshy. I didn't think about doing that.
Join the discussion

by tohellandback » Tue Aug 11, 2009 5:47 pm
georgeung wrote:Can you not simplify the problem as Freshy had done?

I understand what he had done by believing he already had data 1, but I want to say that kind of simplification cannot be done and I'm hoping someone can explain it to me.

That was pretty slick how you did that, Freshy. I didn't think about doing that.
you can of course do it.
lets say there are 100 students...
40 male and 60 female. if we say 2/5 of the students are business majors.
and if you know that 2/5 of male are business majors. then 2/5 of the remaining group..i.e. females must be business majors.
The powers of two are bloody impolite!!
Join the discussion

by ben wade » Tue Aug 11, 2009 11:05 pm
the mistake freshy makes is that
because (2/5)T = BM
and T = M+F

we can not assume (2/5)M + (2/5)F = BM
It should be (2/5)(M+F) = (x)M + (y)F.

From st 1: (x)M = (2/5)M

which gives us (2/5)(M+F) = (2/5)M + (y)F
but it is insufficient as it does not give a value for F
However, we get to know that (y)F has to be (2/5)F

St2: says (y)F = 200
but we do not know y. (y can 2/5 or 3/5....)
so Insuff

combining the 2,
we get to know that (y)F = (2/5)F = 200.
So F = 500.
Hence C.

Hope this helps.
Join the discussion

by georgeung » Wed Aug 12, 2009 6:44 am
That did help. THank you for answering that.
Join the discussion

by adilka » Thu Aug 13, 2009 9:55 am
ben wade wrote:the mistake freshy makes is that
because (2/5)T = BM
and T = M+F

we can not assume (2/5)M + (2/5)F = BM
It should be (2/5)(M+F) = (x)M + (y)F.
That's where I'm not totally clear. I operate based on mathematical principles, so based on a simple principle that
x*(a+b)=x*a+x*b

What is wrong with assuming that

2/5*(M+F) not equal to 2/5*M+ 2/5*F

i know im making some sort of an implicit assumption wrong but can't put a finger to it.
Join the discussion