BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

I love Cigarettes :)

Expert replies
by gmatblood » Sat Nov 05, 2011 12:42 pm
In the year following an 8-cent increase in the federal tax on a pack of cigarettes, sales of cigarettes fell 10%. In contrast, in the year prior to the tax increase, sales had fallen 1%. The volume of cigarette sales is therefore strongly related to the after-tax price of a pack of cigarettes.

The argument above requires which of the following assumptions?

A. During the year following the tax increase, the pretax price of a pack of cigarettes did not increase by as much as it had during the year prior to the tax increase.

B. The one percent fall in cigarette sales in the year prior to tax increase was due to a smaller tax increase.

C. The pretax price of a pack of cigarettes gradually decreased throughout the year before and the year after the tax increase.

D. For the year following the tax increase, the pretax price of a pack if cigarettes were not eight or more cents lower than it had been the previous year.

E. As the after-tax price of a pack of cigarettes rises, the pretax price also rises.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by rijul007 » Sat Nov 05, 2011 12:47 pm
IMO : B
Join the discussion

by ranjeet75 » Sat Nov 05, 2011 9:18 pm
Yes B is definitely the assumption on which the argument "The volume of cigarette sales is therefore strongly related to the after-tax price of a pack of cigarettes" depends.

In the year when tax increases by 8-cent, sales fall by 10%. In the year tax increases by 0.5 cents, sales fall by 1%.
Join the discussion

by mankey » Thu Nov 10, 2011 6:54 am
IMO: B

What is the OA?

Thanks.
Join the discussion

by cool7241744 » Fri Nov 11, 2011 8:21 am
IMO B is the right option

Because this options is describing the relationship of the variables discussed in the above paragraph.
Join the discussion

by sam2304 » Fri Nov 11, 2011 8:32 am
IMO B.
Getting defeated is just a temporary notion, giving it up is what makes it permanent.
https://gmatandbeyond.blogspot.in/
Join the discussion

by tuanquang269 » Sun Nov 13, 2011 7:03 pm
gmatblood wrote:In the year following an 8-cent increase in the federal tax on a pack of cigarettes, sales of cigarettes fell 10%. In contrast, in the year prior to the tax increase, sales had fallen 1%. The volume of cigarette sales is therefore strongly related to the after-tax price of a pack of cigarettes.

The argument above requires which of the following assumptions?

D. For the year following the tax increase, the pretax price of a pack if cigarettes were not eight or more cents lower than it had been the previous year.
Nope. I choose D. Let's me give more specific example:
The pretax price of a pack in 2010 = 20 cent
In 2011, the price of a pack after tax = 28 cent Right? Nope, I do not have information about pretax price.

I will negate the choice D. If the pretax price of a pack is >= 8 cent. I mean that the pretax price of a pack is 12 cent or lower. The price will be 20 or lower comparable with price of 2010. Although price after tax is the same, the sales in 2011 is still less than in 2010. So, price do not relate to sale. Weaken. This is the assumption.
B. The one percent fall in cigarette sales in the year prior to tax increase was due to a smaller tax increase.
B will wrong if the pretax price in 2010 (previous year) higher than the price in 2011. Lack of mentioning pretax price makes this choice totally wrong. :D.

In a nutshell, with all questions relate to revenue, price, etc. We have to count all factor affect the final result :D.
Join the discussion

by David@VeritasPrep » Tue Nov 15, 2011 3:14 pm
tuanquang269 is exactly right!

On a question like this, where you have a proposed cause (tax increase leads to higher after-tax price) and an effect (fewer cigarettes sold) you have to be sure that the cause actually exists!

If choice D is not there, in other words if price of cigarettes actually went down EVEN after the 8 cent tax increase then the decrease in the volume of cigarettes sold is not a result of price.
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Sat Feb 18, 2012 5:25 am
I received a PM asking me to comment. Check my post here:

https://www.beatthegmat.com/in-the-year- ... 83001.html
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion