BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

I dont get it.....

Expert replies
by Stele » Mon Aug 20, 2007 4:24 pm
A lot of the people here are foreign. It's no surprise they'll be better than the average American. Chinese elementary schools, for instance, start teaching Algebra at least as early as second grade. Most kids here at that age can barely read.
Join the discussion
Source: — GMAT Strategy |

by microwonder » Mon Aug 20, 2007 4:52 pm
yeah but that cant be it. There are pleanty of native americans here who can knock these questions out of the park. I dont know why my abilities are so poor compared to the rest of the guys here.
Join the discussion

by Prasanna » Mon Aug 20, 2007 5:05 pm
microwonder

I dont think it is a fruitful exercise to compare yourself with others :( . If you hace ascertained your target GMAT score, you should work towards it. If you have been spending time without progress, you might have to relook at the study approach. Think on those lines...And remember GMAT is only one part of you app process..Schools will not deny your application if you are great material otherwise...

We are here to help you. We have experts on this forum who can guide you.

Prasanna
Join the discussion

by microwonder » Mon Aug 20, 2007 5:07 pm
I totally agree, but I was just wondering if I am not good as others on this site because, either most have learned this before and I haven't, or maybe I am just stupid..........
Join the discussion

by Stacey Koprince » Mon Aug 20, 2007 10:29 pm
Most people who are doing well with the math did learn most or all of this once already in high school or college - so don't compare yourself to them! They're re-learning it, not learning it for the first time. Even among the U.S. contingent here, there are a lot of people with engineering, science, and math backgrounds, so they did learn a lot of this stuff in school.
Please note: I do not use the Private Messaging system! I will not see any PMs that you send to me!!

Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor
Director of Online Community
Manhattan GMAT

Contributor to Beat The GMAT!

Learn more about me
Join the discussion

by aim-wsc » Tue Aug 21, 2007 10:51 am
Yes I think most of us here already know it and are REVISING /brushing up. but believe me it goes as tough as to anybody , since GMAT is an CAT (Adaptive test) and it's very very difficult to score 50/51 even to math expert.

& it has nothing to do with demographics.
American/ international jazz: doesn't apply/affect (not at least in quant area)
Join the discussion

by microwonder » Tue Aug 21, 2007 12:42 pm
how about scoring from a 45-47. Do you need to be a math whiz to do that?
Join the discussion

by Stacey Koprince » Tue Aug 21, 2007 1:12 pm
45-47 in quant corresponds to about the low 80s percentile-wise. So you have to be better than 80% of the GMAT-test-taking population.
Please note: I do not use the Private Messaging system! I will not see any PMs that you send to me!!

Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor
Director of Online Community
Manhattan GMAT

Contributor to Beat The GMAT!

Learn more about me
Join the discussion

by beny » Tue Aug 21, 2007 8:04 pm
I don't consider myself a math whiz, but I usually pull at least a 49 in math. It's a bit less common for me to get 50 or 51.
Join the discussion