Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

I do not know how to get to the answer for this question

Problem Solving — algebra and arithmetic
Expert replies
by tvtt2010 » Wed Jul 06, 2011 12:36 pm
If the average (arithmetic mean) of 5 positive temperatures is x degress F, then the sum of the 3 greatest of these temperatures, in degress F, could be
A) 6x
B) 4x
C) 5x/3
D) 3x/2
E) 3x/5


Please explain to me. Thanks
Join the discussion
Source: — Quantitative Reasoning |

by vineeshp » Wed Jul 06, 2011 4:56 pm
This is an awesome question and I go with B.

My take:
Since arithmetic mean of 5 positive numbers is x, sum is 5x.

Now we need to go by the process of elimination. Logic applied here is that the sum of the 3 greatest numbers should definitely be greater than the sum of the 2 smaller numbers.

A) 6x - not possible since the sum of 5 numbers itself is 5x.
B) 4x - looks possible. Sum of smaller = x < Sum of 3 larger. yes this is our answer.
C) 5x/3 - Sum of 3 numbers is 5x/3. So sum of the remaining 2 numbers has to be 5x - 5x/3 = 10x/3 : Again not possible since sum of the 3 greater numbers should be greater than the sum of the 2 smaller numbers.
D) 3x/2 Similar logic applied. Sum of 2 smaller = 7x/2 > 3x/2.
E) 3x/5 - Similarly> Sum of 2 smaller = 22x/5 > sum of 3 larger.
Vineesh,
Just telling you what I know and think. I am not the expert. :)
Join the discussion

by tvtt2010 » Thu Jul 07, 2011 8:26 pm
Thank you
Join the discussion

by MBA.Aspirant » Fri Jul 08, 2011 3:41 am
tvtt2010 wrote:If the average (arithmetic mean) of 5 positive temperatures is x degress F, then the sum of the 3 greatest of these temperatures, in degress F, could be
A) 6x
B) 4x
C) 5x/3
D) 3x/2
E) 3x/5


Please explain to me. Thanks
say x = 10

sum = 5*10 = 50

50 could = 20+10+10+5+5

sum of greatest 3 = 20+10+10 = 40

plugin the answers with x =10

only B works
Join the discussion

by Tani » Fri Jul 08, 2011 1:17 pm
1. The sum of all five would be 5x, and since the temperatures are all positive, the sum of the three largest would have to be less than the sum of all five. (0 is not positive. Eliminate A

If all five temperatures were the same, then each one would be x degrees, and the sum of the three largest would be 3x. That establishes our minimum, eliminating C, D, and E.

The answer is B.
Tani Wolff
Join the discussion