BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

hypotheses

Expert replies
by arorag » Sun Sep 20, 2009 4:20 pm
A nutritionist studying the effects of massive doses of vitamin C found that of a group of 600 people who regularly took 1,500 mg of vitamin C daily for a year, fewer than 9 percent suffered serious cases of flu; of a group of 600 people who took 250 mg of vitamin C (the standard recommended daily allowance) daily for a year, 34 percent suffered at least one serious case of flu; and of a group of 600 people who took no vitamin C for a year (other than that found in the foods in a balanced diet), 32 percent suffered at least one serious case of flu.
Which of the following hypotheses is best supported by the evidence above?
(A) The effectiveness of vitamin C in preventing serious cases of flu increases in direct proportion to the amount of vitamin C taken.
(B) Vitamin C is helpful in preventing disease.
(C) Doses of vitamin C that exceed the standard recommended daily allowance by 500 percent will reduce the incidence of serious cases of flu by 25 percent.
(D) Massive doses of vitamin C can help to prevent serious case of flu.
(E) A balanced diet contains less than 250 mg of vitamin C.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Re: hypotheses

by ankit1383 » Sun Sep 20, 2009 7:25 pm
(A) The effectiveness of vitamin C in preventing serious cases of flu increases in direct proportion to the amount of vitamin C taken.This is just opposite of what the argument says
(B) Vitamin C is helpful in preventing disease.It doesnt prevent but reduces the chances
(C) Doses of vitamin C that exceed the standard recommended daily allowance by 500 percent will reduce the incidence of serious cases of flu by 25 percent.CORRECT
(D) Massive doses of vitamin C can help to prevent serious case of flu.Doesn't prevent but reduce the chances
(E) A balanced diet contains less than 250 mg of vitamin C.It is not mentioned in the argument
Join the discussion

by sunnyjohn » Sun Sep 20, 2009 7:33 pm
IMO : D

0 ---> 32%
250 ---> 34% <====
1500 ---> 9%
Join the discussion

by vinayakdl » Sun Sep 20, 2009 7:51 pm
I will go with D.
I think the stimuli is tempting us to think that based on the data provided we can say that Vitamin C has a sure-shot effect on incidence of flu but we cannot know this wihtout knowing more about the data set. The use of word "may" in D makes it more plausible.

Vinayak
Join the discussion

by crackgmat007 » Sun Sep 20, 2009 9:30 pm
D seems plausible inference based on the facts.
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Mon Sep 21, 2009 6:11 am
clash of titans??C or D

IMO C
Join the discussion

by singhag » Mon Sep 21, 2009 6:44 am
IMO C

IMO for D to be true it should be consistent with the fact that from 600 mg to none except found in fruits which we didnt know, the deviation should be high or low.
Join the discussion

by arorag » Mon Sep 21, 2009 5:34 pm
OA I have is D, I opted for C
I am not convinced with OA..
Any expert????
Join the discussion

by sunnyjohn » Mon Sep 21, 2009 7:04 pm
(C) Doses of vitamin C that exceed the standard recommended daily allowance by 500 percent will reduce the incidence of serious cases of flu by 25 percent.


reduce the incidence by 25% :--> With respect to What?

0 mg
or
250 mg
or
Over all public
so C is out.


(D) Massive doses of vitamin C can help to prevent serious case of flu.

is the next best option.
Join the discussion

by Musicolo » Mon Sep 21, 2009 11:51 pm
Not convinced with the OA.
Don't like D because of "massive doses". What does that mean???
Join the discussion

by mehravikas » Mon Sep 21, 2009 11:57 pm
Not convinced with the OA. If 'D' had massive doses of swine flu reduces the serious cases of swine flu, then 'D' would have been correct.
Join the discussion

by kris77 » Sun May 15, 2016 4:13 pm
It seems to me that the right answer is D
Join the discussion