• 5-Day Free Trial
5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Veritas GMAT Class
Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
Register now and save up to $200 Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • 5 Day FREE Trial Study Smarter, Not Harder Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • Reach higher with Artificial Intelligence. Guaranteed Now free for 30 days Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • Free Practice Test & Review How would you score if you took the GMAT Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • Get 300+ Practice Questions 25 Video lessons and 6 Webinars for FREE Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • Magoosh Study with Magoosh GMAT prep Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • Free Trial & Practice Exam BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • 1 Hour Free BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE Available with Beat the GMAT members only code ## Hybrid cars use significantly less fuel This topic has 1 expert reply and 1 member reply AbeNeedsAnswers Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Joined 02 Jul 2017 Posted: 192 messages Followed by: 2 members Upvotes: 1 #### Hybrid cars use significantly less fuel Mon Jul 03, 2017 8:54 pm Politician: Hybrid cars use significantly less fuel per kilometer than nonhybrids. And fuel produces air pollution, which contributes to a number of environmental problems. Motorists can save money by driving cars that are more fuel efficient, and they will be encouraged to drive hybrid cars if we make them aware of that fact. Therefore, we can help reduce the total amount of pollution emitted by cars in this country by highlighting this advantage of hybrid cars. Which of the following, if true, would most indicate a vulnerability of the politician's argument? (A) People with more fuel-efficient cars typically drive more than do those with less fuel-efficient cars. (B) Not all air pollution originates from automobiles. (C) Hybrid cars have already begun to gain popularity. (D) Fuel-efficient alternatives to hybrid cars will likely become available in the future. (E) The future cost of gasoline and other fuel cannot be predicted with absolute precision or certainty. A Pratishtha21 Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts Joined 01 Jul 2017 Posted: 32 messages Sat Jul 15, 2017 12:37 pm The argument states that if ppl are aware of the benefits of fuel efficient hybrid cars then they will buy them and hence air pollution will reduce. However imagine a scenario where a person who buys a hybrid car drives it double the time he used to drive a non-hybrid car. Then the amount of air pollution will be same. This vulnerability is mentioned in the choice A which is the answer. ### GMAT/MBA Expert DavidG@VeritasPrep Legendary Member Joined 14 Jan 2015 Posted: 2667 messages Followed by: 120 members Upvotes: 1153 GMAT Score: 770 Tue Jul 04, 2017 11:10 am AbeNeedsAnswers wrote: Politician: Hybrid cars use significantly less fuel per kilometer than nonhybrids. And fuel produces air pollution, which contributes to a number of environmental problems. Motorists can save money by driving cars that are more fuel efficient, and they will be encouraged to drive hybrid cars if we make them aware of that fact. Therefore, we can help reduce the total amount of pollution emitted by cars in this country by highlighting this advantage of hybrid cars. Which of the following, if true, would most indicate a vulnerability of the politician's argument? (A) People with more fuel-efficient cars typically drive more than do those with less fuel-efficient cars. (B) Not all air pollution originates from automobiles. (C) Hybrid cars have already begun to gain popularity. (D) Fuel-efficient alternatives to hybrid cars will likely become available in the future. (E) The future cost of gasoline and other fuel cannot be predicted with absolute precision or certainty. A Conclusion: We can reduce pollution emitted by cars if we encourage people to buy hybrid cars Premise: Hybrid cars use less fuels per kilometer than non-hybrids. If we're looking for a vulnerability, we want a scenario in which having people purchase hybrid cars may not reduce pollution at all. Say, for example, that people who purchase hybrids feel comfortable driving much longer distances? They produce less pollution per kilometer, but if they're covering far more kilometers than non-hybrid drivers, this will offset any advantage. Captured in A _________________ Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor Veritas Prep Reviews Save$100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course

Enroll in a Veritas Prep GMAT class completely for FREE. Wondering if a GMAT course is right for you? Attend the first class session of an actual GMAT course, either in-person or live online, and see for yourself why so many students choose to work with Veritas Prep. Find a class now!

### Best Conversation Starters

1 lheiannie07 72 topics
2 LUANDATO 60 topics
3 ardz24 48 topics
4 AAPL 46 topics
5 M7MBA 45 topics
See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

### Most Active Experts

1 Jeff@TargetTestPrep

Target Test Prep

141 posts
2 Brent@GMATPrepNow

GMAT Prep Now Teacher

136 posts
3 GMATGuruNY

The Princeton Review Teacher

134 posts
4 Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

EMPOWERgmat

128 posts
5 Scott@TargetTestPrep

Target Test Prep

99 posts
See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts