In the mid-fifth century, Rome was threatened by hunnish troops who led by Atilla the Hun, demostrated his millitary superiority over the weakened, recently conquered city.
A.who led by Atilla the Hun, demostrated his millitary superiority
B.which, led by Atilla the hun, demostrated their military superiority
C.that atilla the hun led, who demonstrated his military superiority
D.that atilla the hun led in demonstration of their military superiority
E.that were led by Atilla the Hun, who demonstrated his military superiority
[spoiler] OA: B
I write the sentence using 'B'
In the mid-fifth century, Rome was threatened by hunnish troops, which, led by Atilla the hun, demonstrated their military superiority over the weakened, recently conquered city.
I understand "led by Atilla the hun" is a apposite modifier that modifies the noun troops. Fine
What are the subjects of verbs i'e' "denomstrated" and "conquered"? If it is common subject i.e. Troops? Why not 'and' is placed to seperate two verbs "denomstrated" and "conquered"? [/spoiler]
A.who led by Atilla the Hun, demostrated his millitary superiority
B.which, led by Atilla the hun, demostrated their military superiority
C.that atilla the hun led, who demonstrated his military superiority
D.that atilla the hun led in demonstration of their military superiority
E.that were led by Atilla the Hun, who demonstrated his military superiority
[spoiler] OA: B
I write the sentence using 'B'
In the mid-fifth century, Rome was threatened by hunnish troops, which, led by Atilla the hun, demonstrated their military superiority over the weakened, recently conquered city.
I understand "led by Atilla the hun" is a apposite modifier that modifies the noun troops. Fine
What are the subjects of verbs i'e' "denomstrated" and "conquered"? If it is common subject i.e. Troops? Why not 'and' is placed to seperate two verbs "denomstrated" and "conquered"? [/spoiler]
