BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Huges

Expert replies
by Vignesh.4384 » Tue Jul 22, 2008 5:31 am
Over his 65-year life span, Hughes, one of America’s most enduring writers and a key figure in the Harlem Renaissance of the 1920’s, will have published hundreds of poems, plus novels, short stories, autobiographies, librettos, essays and children’s books.


A. will have published hundreds of poems, plus novels, short stories, autobiographies, librettos, essays and children’s books.
B. is publishing hundreds of poems, plus novels, short stories, autobiographies, librettos, essays and children’s books.
C. would have published hundreds of poems, plus novels, short stories, autobiographies, librettos, essays and children’s books.
D. will publish hundreds of poems, plus novels, short stories, autobiographies, librettos, essays and children’s books.
E. would publish hundreds of poems, plus novels, short stories, autobiographies, librettos, essays and children’s books.

Can some one explain this ?
The OA says E but however i dont think the answer can be E.
Please share your thoughts
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by ricky » Tue Jul 22, 2008 5:58 am
A and C leaves the sentence incomplete(Will have/Would have....if...but if(the condition) is not stated in sentence.

Since we know that subject(a proper noun) is part of history we cant use is or will.So B and D are wrong.
Join the discussion

by veenu08 » Sat Jan 25, 2014 12:35 pm
can someone please explain me this question as I am not able to reach to any one of the correct answers :(
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Sat Jan 25, 2014 8:34 pm
Hi All,

This SC involves a rarer verb issue: how to properly present a period of time that occurs in the past.

The prompt starts with "Over his 65-year life span..." and includes a time reference "...of the 1920s...", so we know that the entire 65 years took place in the past. Even if we're not sure which verb to use, we can eliminate several answers since the verb tense doesn't make sense:

Answers A and D use the verb "will", which is a future-tense verb and does not fit the given situation.
Answer B uses the verb "is", which is present tense and also does not fit the given situation.

That leaves us with no choice but to use the verb "would" (answers C and E). Grammatically, this is actually a good choice, since the phrase "would publish" is an abbreviated version of "....he would eventually publish...." Answer C uses the phrase "...would have published..." which seems like more of a "hypothetical" than "factual" statement. Since we're talking about something that did happen, the factual/declarative phrase "would publish" is correct.

Final Answer: E

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image
Join the discussion

by divineacclivity » Sun Mar 23, 2014 7:59 am
Ref: ***********************
That leaves us with no choice but to use the verb "would" (answers C and E). Grammatically, this is actually a good choice, since the phrase "would publish" is an abbreviated version of "....he would eventually publish...." Answer C uses the phrase "...would have published..." which seems like more of a "hypothetical" than "factual" statement. Since we're talking about something that did happen, the factual/declarative phrase "would publish" is correct.
********************

Hi Rich,

In this sentence, I thought C option - 'would have' - hypothetical worked because he says Hughes would have published hundreds (=> the author is not sure of the exact number of poems etc Hughes had published).
e.g. Allen published 5 novels
e.g. Allen would have published 5 novels in the past year and 5 more might be on their way for this year.
Would you please help me understand better why E is better than C? Thanks in advance.
Join the discussion

by divineacclivity » Sun Mar 23, 2014 8:01 am
Hi Rich,

In this sentence, I thought C option - 'would have' - hypothetical worked because he says Hughes would have published hundreds (=> the author is not sure of the exact number of poems etc Hughes had published).
e.g. Allen published 5 novels
e.g. Allen would have published 5 novels in the past year and 5 more might be on their way for this year.
Would you please help me understand better why E is better than C? Thanks in advance.
[email protected] wrote:Hi All,

This SC involves a rarer verb issue: how to properly present a period of time that occurs in the past.

The prompt starts with "Over his 65-year life span..." and includes a time reference "...of the 1920s...", so we know that the entire 65 years took place in the past. Even if we're not sure which verb to use, we can eliminate several answers since the verb tense doesn't make sense:

Answers A and D use the verb "will", which is a future-tense verb and does not fit the given situation.
Answer B uses the verb "is", which is present tense and also does not fit the given situation.

That leaves us with no choice but to use the verb "would" (answers C and E). Grammatically, this is actually a good choice, since the phrase "would publish" is an abbreviated version of "....he would eventually publish...." Answer C uses the phrase "...would have published..." which seems like more of a "hypothetical" than "factual" statement. Since we're talking about something that did happen, the factual/declarative phrase "would publish" is correct.

Final Answer: E

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1