BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

[CR][Reimburse] HSPA posts

Expert replies
by HSPA » Wed Jul 13, 2011 8:38 am
Federal law prohibits businesses from reimbursing any employees for the cost of owning and operating a privateaircraft that is used for business purposes. Thus, many American companies themselves purchase private aircraft.The vast majority of the business aviation fleet is owned by small and mid-size businesses, and flights are strictlyfor business purposes, with mostly mid-level employees on board. These companies and their boards of directorsare in full compliance with the law and with what is best for their businesses.

Which of the following can be most properly inferred from the statements above?

"¢The Federal law in question costs businesses money.

"¢Most executives would rather fly on company owned planes than on commercial airlines.

"¢Large businesses usually have their executives fly first or business class on commercial flights.

"¢Upper level executives are less often in compliance with the law.

"¢By not receiving any reimbursement for these flights, the mid-level executives on board are complying with thelaw.
First take: 640 (50M, 27V) - RC needs 300% improvement
Second take: coming soon..
Regards,
HSPA.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by knight247 » Wed Jul 13, 2011 9:17 am
(A)Possible contender
(B)Makes assumption about executives preferences.Can't do that on an inference question.Incorrect.
(C)Makes an assumption.Not allowed. Incorrect
(D)Assumptive.Incorrect.
(E)Possible contender

So its either [spoiler](A)[/spoiler] or [spoiler](E)[/spoiler]. Can't seem to narrow it down any further...Whats the OA?
Join the discussion

by sanabk » Wed Jul 13, 2011 11:53 am
IMO: A

E talks about mid-level executives...Hope my reasoning is correct.
Join the discussion

by HSPA » Thu Jul 14, 2011 7:38 am
sanabk wrote:IMO: A

E talks about mid-level executives...Hope my reasoning is correct.
Can you point me to the area in the stem which can prove A. If A is wrong.. how can you prove E
First take: 640 (50M, 27V) - RC needs 300% improvement
Second take: coming soon..
Regards,
HSPA.
Join the discussion

by goalevan » Sat Jul 16, 2011 11:57 am
I'm also stuck between A and E. On one hand, the cost of owning and operating a private aircraft would be the same to the company whether it owned the aircraft itself or reimbursed an employee. On the other, no mention is made on whether the employees comply with the laws, only the company and the board. Both answer choices seem to be a stretch.

B) Most executives would rather fly on company owned planes than on commercial airlines. Out of scope. No mention is made of the preference between commercial and company-owned planes.

C) Large businesses usually have their executives fly first or business class on commercial flights. Out of scope. Company practice on commercial flights is not mentioned.

D) Upper level executives are less often in compliance with the law. Out of scope. The passage discusses mid-level employees.
Join the discussion

by mankey » Sat Nov 26, 2011 12:02 am
Is it E?

Please provide OA?

Thanks.
Join the discussion

by HSPA » Sun Nov 27, 2011 1:14 am
mankey wrote:Is it E?

Please provide OA?

Thanks.
Yes OA is E
First take: 640 (50M, 27V) - RC needs 300% improvement
Second take: coming soon..
Regards,
HSPA.
Join the discussion