BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

How many items did Bob produce last week?

Expert replies
by crazy4gmat » Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:22 pm
If Bob produces 36 or fewer in a week, he is paid X dollars per item. If Bob produces more than 36 items, he is paid X dollars per item for the first 36 items, and 3/2 times that amount for each additional item. How many items did Bob produce last week?

1). Last week Bob was paid total of $480 for the items that he produced that week.

2). This week produced 2 items more than last week and was paid a total of $510 for the item that he produced this week.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by aakaps » Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:31 pm
Both combined are insufficient as the formula is 2 way....till 36 and beyond. If I consider his objects less than 36 I will have one answer, if more then another.
Join the discussion

by grockit_jake » Tue Sep 01, 2009 1:39 pm
Exactly. If we knew the number sold in both weeks was over 36, the equation would be:

$ = 36x + (T-36)*(3/2)

However, since we don't know it's over 36, the equation could also be

$ = xT,

which are 2 very different things.
Jake Becker
Academic Director
Grockit Test Prep
https://www.grockit.com
Join the discussion

by mehravikas » Tue Sep 01, 2009 9:54 pm
I may be wrong here but the answer is C.

Agree that each statement individually is insufficient. However, if you combine both the statements then

You would get X = 15 if items were fewer than 36
or X = 20 if items are more than 36

Now if X = 15

Statement 1 - Number of items produced = 480/15 = 32
Statement 2 - number of items produced = 510/15 = 34

Difference of 2 items

If X = 20

Statement 1 - Number of items produced = 480/20 = 24
Statement 2 - number of items produced = 510/20 = 25.xxx

Difference between the number of items last week and this week is not 2.

There X = 15 and we can find the number of items.
Join the discussion

by grockit_jake » Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:33 am
I think you are mistaken:

Together, we know that 2 items cost $30, so 1 additional item cost $15.

If below the 36 threshold, then we know X = 15.

If above the 36 threshold, we know that 3/2X = 15, so X = 10.

If x = 10, then you will have a $30 increase when adding two items, if the total is above 36. If x = 15, then adding 2 items will increase the total $30.

In this case, you don't have enough info.
Jake Becker
Academic Director
Grockit Test Prep
https://www.grockit.com
Join the discussion

by mehravikas » Wed Sep 02, 2009 12:03 pm
But if X = 10, then total items purchased would be 48 (last week)

and the calculation of 3/2X would be for 12 items not just 2 items.

Therefore the total cost would be = 36*10 + 12*15 = 540

grockit_jake wrote:I think you are mistaken:

Together, we know that 2 items cost $30, so 1 additional item cost $15.

If below the 36 threshold, then we know X = 15.

If above the 36 threshold, we know that 3/2X = 15, so X = 10.

If x = 10, then you will have a $30 increase when adding two items, if the total is above 36. If x = 15, then adding 2 items will increase the total $30.

In this case, you don't have enough info.
Join the discussion

by grockit_jake » Wed Sep 02, 2009 12:10 pm
If below the 36 threshold, x = 15

Last week $480 = 15*T , so T = 32
This week $510 = 15*T , so T = 34

If above the 36 threshold, x = 10

Last week $480 = 10*36 + 15*Additional, so A = 8, so T = 36+8 = 44

This week $510 = 10*36 + 15*Additional, so A = 10, so T = 36+10= 46

Both options leave you with 2 more items and $30 more dollars.
Jake Becker
Academic Director
Grockit Test Prep
https://www.grockit.com
Join the discussion

by mehravikas » Wed Sep 02, 2009 12:18 pm
Oh I think you are correct...

Thanks,
Vikas
grockit_jake wrote:If below the 36 threshold, x = 15

Last week $480 = 15*T , so T = 32
This week $510 = 15*T , so T = 34

If above the 36 threshold, x = 10

Last week $480 = 10*36 + 15*Additional, so A = 8, so T = 36+8 = 44

This week $510 = 10*36 + 15*Additional, so A = 10, so T = 36+10= 46

Both options leave you with 2 more items and $30 more dollars.
Join the discussion

by aakaps » Fri Sep 04, 2009 2:36 pm
If this is a question from OG and the answer is c, I will think this is one of the question which GMAT prep folks just want you to put formulae and equate. Wrong question and similarly flow with the answer :)
Join the discussion