BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Hospitals Per-patient funding

Expert replies
by newton9 » Fri Jun 10, 2011 5:29 am
Several studies have shown that hospitals are not all equally successful: patients are much more likely to die in some of them than in others. Since the hospitals in the studies had approximately equal per-patient funding, differences in the quality of care provided by hospital staff are probably responsible for the differences in mortality rates.

Which one of the following, if true, casts the most doubt on the conclusion drawn above?


(A) The staff in some of the hospitals studied had earned more advanced degrees, on average, than the staff in the other hospitals.

(B) Patient populations vary substantially in average severity of illness from hospital to hospital.

(C) The average number of years that staff members stay on at a given job varies considerably from one hospital to another.

(D) Approximately the same surgical procedures were performed in each of the hospitals covered in the studies.

(E) Mortality rates for hospital patients do not vary considerably from one region of the country to another.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by M09 » Fri Jun 10, 2011 5:50 am
newton9 wrote:Several studies have shown that hospitals are not all equally successful: patients are much more likely to die in some of them than in others. Since the hospitals in the studies had approximately equal per-patient funding, differences in the quality of care provided by hospital staff are probably responsible for the differences in mortality rates.

Which one of the following, if true, casts the most doubt on the conclusion drawn above?


(A) The staff in some of the hospitals studied had earned more advanced degrees, on average, than the staff in the other hospitals.

(B) Patient populations vary substantially in average severity of illness from hospital to hospital.

(C) The average number of years that staff members stay on at a given job varies considerably from one hospital to another.

(D) Approximately the same surgical procedures were performed in each of the hospitals covered in the studies.

(E) Mortality rates for hospital patients do not vary considerably from one region of the country to another.
IMO B
Join the discussion

by HSPA » Fri Jun 10, 2011 8:57 am
+1 for B
First take: 640 (50M, 27V) - RC needs 300% improvement
Second take: coming soon..
Regards,
HSPA.
Join the discussion

by boazkhan » Fri Jun 10, 2011 9:06 am
B for me!
Join the discussion

by vishalkc2 » Fri Jun 10, 2011 10:06 am
IMO B. What is the OA?
Join the discussion

by newton9 » Fri Jun 10, 2011 10:09 am
OA B
Join the discussion

by badresh70 » Sat Jun 11, 2011 7:32 am
IMO : B
Join the discussion

by ranjithreddy.k9 » Fri Jun 17, 2011 3:34 am
my take option B
Join the discussion

by Ozlemg » Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:22 am
my first answer was A.
But after reading the question once more, I realized that the issue was not the staff but the patients
So B sounds ok.

My 2 cents:
It is false to generalize "The higher the mortality rate, the worse the hospital" because "rate" can not tell the whole story and the reality behind it. For the fact that, some hospitals substantially have greater number of patients than others do.

Lets talk with numbers:

International Hospital :Mortaliy Rate 60%, Number of people die: 10.000
Local Hospital : Mortaliy Rate 90%, Number of people die: 1000

So it is obvious that the higher the mortality rate never means the worse the hospital...
The more you suffer before the test, the less you will do so in the test! :)
Join the discussion

by smackmartine » Fri Jun 17, 2011 10:28 pm
Alternate cause should be sufficient to weaken the conclusion in this question. Option B does the same
Smack is Back ...
It takes time and effort to explain, so if my comment helped you please press Thanks button :)
Join the discussion

by madddie » Sat Jun 18, 2011 3:52 am
Option B is correct.
It provides an alternate cause for the difference in rate of death
The argument states that Lack of care is the reason

But B states that the severity of illness at diff. hospitals could have been the reason behind the findings.....

If you like my explanation please press the "Thank" Button
Join the discussion

by Prashant Ranjan » Mon Jul 23, 2012 11:08 pm
Maddie is correct. This is a quintessential reasoning flaw that is employed by Weakening or Assumption questions. If X and Y occur together, then X caused Y (or vice versa). So if X doesn't happen then Y is also not going to happen.
The best way to tackle these questions is notice this kind of reasoning. For weakening we need to just bring an additional info that Y is not solely dependent on X but a lot of other factors too.

Thanks
Prashant
Join the discussion