BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Honey-bees

Expert replies
by rahulg83 » Sat May 30, 2009 1:23 am
In California, varroa mites decimated the domestic honey-bee population in 2004, which caused a notable decrease in honey production during this year. When a pesticide that is not harmful to honey-bees was introduced in 2005 to exterminate varroa mites, honey production increased – by up to 10 percent in some areas – but then decreased sharply in 2006.

Which of the following statements, if true, would best explain the 2006 decrease in honey production?

(A)In 2006, bee-keepers were more likely to use the pesticide than any other form of mite population control.
(B) Varroa mites do not harm bees directly, but rather spread diseases and viruses that are particularly harmful to honey-bees.
(C)The same amount of the pesticide was applied to the areas infested by mites in 2005 and in 2006.
(D) Rapid growth in a bee population tends to deplete resources that bees need to produce honey.
(E) The demand for honey fell between 2004 and 2006, and this caused the price of honey to fall significantly.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by sanp_l » Sat May 30, 2009 2:23 am
A,B and C doesn't explain as to how the production of honey might have gone down.
E speaks of demand and price relationship.

But D states a probable cause as to how the production of honey might have gone down.
I go with D.
Sandy
Join the discussion

by aj5105 » Sat May 30, 2009 2:55 am
[spoiler](D) for Denmark[/spoiler]
Join the discussion

Re: Honey-bees

by amazonviper » Mon Jun 01, 2009 10:14 am
rahulg83 wrote:In California, varroa mites decimated the domestic honey-bee population in 2004, which caused a notable decrease in honey production during this year. When a pesticide that is not harmful to honey-bees was introduced in 2005 to exterminate varroa mites, honey production increased – by up to 10 percent in some areas – but then decreased sharply in 2006.

Which of the following statements, if true, would best explain the 2006 decrease in honey production?

(A)In 2006, bee-keepers were more likely to use the pesticide than any other form of mite population control.
(B) Varroa mites do not harm bees directly, but rather spread diseases and viruses that are particularly harmful to honey-bees.
(C)The same amount of the pesticide was applied to the areas infested by mites in 2005 and in 2006.
(D) Rapid growth in a bee population tends to deplete resources that bees need to produce honey.
(E) The demand for honey fell between 2004 and 2006, and this caused the price of honey to fall significantly.

IMHO only D seems to the right answer. The other choices just don't cut it . Please let us know the OA.
Join the discussion

by mehravikas » Mon Jun 01, 2009 1:56 pm
Join the discussion

by shark » Mon Jun 01, 2009 2:37 pm
IMO, D. Correct me if I am wrong.

(A) OUT - Using one pestiside than other does not explain why honey production decreased in 2006.
(B) OUT - out of context
(C) OUT - Same amount of pesticide used in 2005 and 2006. But does not explain why the production is different in 2005 and 2006.
(D) Best Answer - Using pesticides, Varro Mites has been killed/controled in 2005 i.e. Domestic honey-bee population did not get decimated, which resulted in rapid growth of honey-bee population that tends to deplete the resources that need to produce honey.
(E) OUT - Demand fell and honey price fell - Has nothing to do why honey production decreased in 2006.
Join the discussion

by sudeep_ar » Wed Jun 03, 2009 12:59 am
D seems to be the best answer!
Join the discussion

by nicolette » Sun May 15, 2016 2:42 pm
I'm pretty confident that D is correct answer.
Join the discussion

by mason77 » Sun May 15, 2016 3:03 pm
I would go for D as well.
Join the discussion