BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Historical Data

Expert replies
by Onell » Sat Nov 26, 2011 6:21 am
Reviewing historical data, medical researchers in California found that counties with the largest number of television sets per capita have had the lowest incidence of a serious brain disease, mosquito-borne encephalitis. The researchers have concluded that people in these counties stay indoors more and thus avoid exposure to the disease.

The researchers conclusion would be most strengthened if which of the following were true?

(A) Programs designed to control the size of disease-bearing mosquito populations have not affected the incidence of mosquito borne encephalitis.
(B) The occupations of county residents affect their risk of exposure to mosquito-borne encephalitis more than does television-watching.
(C) The incidence of mosquito-borne encephalitis in counties with the largest number of television sets per capita is likely to decrease even further.
(D) The more time people in a county spend outdoors, the greater their awareness of the dangers of mosquito-borne encephalitis.
(E) The more television sets there are per capita in a county, the more time the average county resident spends watching television.

A says other programs have not affected, probably staying indoors did. So doesn't option A strengthen the argument? Experts, pls comment
oa e

Thank you
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by user123321 » Sat Nov 26, 2011 7:35 am
A is more of like an assumption. It strengthens but not the most. When E & A are side by side, I think E strengthens the conclusion more than A does.

user123321
Just started my preparation :D
Want to do it right the first time.
Join the discussion

by Tani » Sat Nov 26, 2011 5:05 pm
The stimulus tells us that the researchers are concluding that when a county has more TV sets, the residents stay indoors more often. This is only true of those residents actually stay inside to watch.

A doesn't help us because we have no information about what counties are receiving programs to kill mosquitoes, so we don't know in which direction those programs might skew the results. If only low-TV counties get the programs that could lower the rate in those counties. If only high-TV counties get the programs the effect would favor those counties.
Tani Wolff
Join the discussion

by tanviet » Tue Jan 17, 2012 8:32 pm
Why C is wrong. BEcause C contain the work "likely"

if C said the incidence decreases

without "likely"

C will be right.

Am I correct?
Join the discussion

by Tani » Wed Jan 18, 2012 8:44 am
We only know that counties with a high incidence of TV sets have a lower incidence of disease. We have no information as to whether the incidence will drop further. It may have reached the minimum afforded by TV watching. So C is not correct.
Tani Wolff
Join the discussion

by ArunangsuSahu » Wed Jan 18, 2012 9:10 pm
Explanation for (E)

People can have TVs..But if they don't view and go out for leisure most of the time then the conclusion doesn't hold good
Join the discussion