Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Historical Data

Expert replies
by Onell » Sat Nov 26, 2011 6:21 am
Reviewing historical data, medical researchers in California found that counties with the largest number of television sets per capita have had the lowest incidence of a serious brain disease, mosquito-borne encephalitis. The researchers have concluded that people in these counties stay indoors more and thus avoid exposure to the disease.

The researchers conclusion would be most strengthened if which of the following were true?

(A) Programs designed to control the size of disease-bearing mosquito populations have not affected the incidence of mosquito borne encephalitis.
(B) The occupations of county residents affect their risk of exposure to mosquito-borne encephalitis more than does television-watching.
(C) The incidence of mosquito-borne encephalitis in counties with the largest number of television sets per capita is likely to decrease even further.
(D) The more time people in a county spend outdoors, the greater their awareness of the dangers of mosquito-borne encephalitis.
(E) The more television sets there are per capita in a county, the more time the average county resident spends watching television.

A says other programs have not affected, probably staying indoors did. So doesn't option A strengthen the argument? Experts, pls comment
oa e

Thank you
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by user123321 » Sat Nov 26, 2011 7:35 am
A is more of like an assumption. It strengthens but not the most. When E & A are side by side, I think E strengthens the conclusion more than A does.

user123321
Just started my preparation :D
Want to do it right the first time.
Join the discussion

by Tani » Sat Nov 26, 2011 5:05 pm
The stimulus tells us that the researchers are concluding that when a county has more TV sets, the residents stay indoors more often. This is only true of those residents actually stay inside to watch.

A doesn't help us because we have no information about what counties are receiving programs to kill mosquitoes, so we don't know in which direction those programs might skew the results. If only low-TV counties get the programs that could lower the rate in those counties. If only high-TV counties get the programs the effect would favor those counties.
Tani Wolff
Join the discussion

by tanviet » Tue Jan 17, 2012 8:32 pm
Why C is wrong. BEcause C contain the work "likely"

if C said the incidence decreases

without "likely"

C will be right.

Am I correct?
Join the discussion

by Tani » Wed Jan 18, 2012 8:44 am
We only know that counties with a high incidence of TV sets have a lower incidence of disease. We have no information as to whether the incidence will drop further. It may have reached the minimum afforded by TV watching. So C is not correct.
Tani Wolff
Join the discussion

by ArunangsuSahu » Wed Jan 18, 2012 9:10 pm
Explanation for (E)

People can have TVs..But if they don't view and go out for leisure most of the time then the conclusion doesn't hold good
Join the discussion