BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

historian

Expert replies
by clar » Tue Sep 01, 2009 2:07 am
. Historian: We can learn about the medical history of individuals through chemical analysis of their hair. It is likely, for example, that Isaac Newton's psychological problems were due to mercury poisoning; traces of mercury were found in his hair. Analysis is now being done on a lock of Beethoven's hair. Although no convincing argument has shown that Beethoven ever had a venereal disease, some people hypothesize that venereal disease caused his deafness. Since mercury was commonly ingested in Beethoven's time to treat venereal disease, if researchers find a trace of mercury in his hair, we can conclude that this hypothesis is correct.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the historian's argument depends?

(A) None of the mercury introduced into the body can be eliminated.
(B) Some people in Beethoven's time did not ingest mercury.
(C) Mercury is an effective treatment for venereal disease.
(D) Mercury poisoning can cause deafness in people with venereal disease.
(E) Beethoven suffered from psychological problems of the same severity as Newton's.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by rohan_vus » Tue Sep 01, 2009 2:21 am
IMO A
Join the discussion

by nitya34 » Tue Sep 01, 2009 6:02 am
via negation also
only A makes sense

Since mercury was commonly ingested in Beethoven's time to treat venereal disease, if researchers find a trace of mercury in his hair, we can conclude that this hypothesis is correct.
Many of the great achievements of the world were accomplished by tired and discouraged men who kept on working.
Join the discussion

by aim.gmat » Tue Sep 01, 2009 6:54 am
IMO A=negation rule
Join the discussion

Re: historian

by crackgmat007 » Tue Sep 01, 2009 3:09 pm
clar wrote:.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the historian's argument depends?

(A) None of the mercury introduced into the body can be eliminated.

Negating this choice weakens the argument.

(B) Some people in Beethoven's time did not ingest mercury.

OOS as it talks about some people

(C) Mercury is an effective treatment for venereal disease.

Not relevant as the argument is not about effectiveness of mercury in treating veneral disease. May be it is effective or may be not. But the usage of mercury is the point.

(D) Mercury poisoning can cause deafness in people with venereal disease.

Weakens the argument by showing an alternative cause that it is not veneral disease that causes deafness but rather mercury

(E) Beethoven suffered from psychological problems of the same severity as Newton's.
Severity is out of scope.
Join the discussion

by ssmiles08 » Tue Sep 01, 2009 3:27 pm
IMO A as well. the assumption relies on the conclusion that medical history can be learnt from chemical analysis. If mercury is never eliminated, then it confirms the the chemical analysis conclusion is correct.
You got a dream... You gotta protect it. People can't do somethin' themselves, they wanna tell you you can't do it. If you want somethin', go get it. Period.
Join the discussion

by heshamelaziry » Tue Sep 01, 2009 9:49 pm
I was thinking conclusion was at the end. If conclusion is the first clause then answer is "A"
Join the discussion

by crackgmat007 » Tue Sep 01, 2009 9:58 pm
heshamelaziry wrote:I was thinking conclusion was at the end. If conclusion is the first clause then answer is "A"
Actually, conclusion is : 'we can conclude that this hypothesis is correct.'

This boil downs to what the hypothesis is...

'Hypothesize that venereal disease caused his deafness.'
Join the discussion

by heshamelaziry » Tue Sep 01, 2009 10:09 pm
crackgmat007 wrote:
heshamelaziry wrote:I was thinking conclusion was at the end. If conclusion is the first clause then answer is "A"
Actually, conclusion is : 'we can conclude that this hypothesis is correct.'

This boil downs to what the hypothesis is...

'Hypothesize that venereal disease caused his deafness.'
Then the answer is D
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:16 am
one more for A!!!
Join the discussion

by heshamelaziry » Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:25 am
This is one of two kinds of assumption question, the less common one. This is a supporter question where there is a missing info in the evidence that needs to be added to make the conclusion valid.

The hypotheses is that Vanerial disease is resposible for this deafness.

Now if mercury is used to treat that disease, then mercury led to his deafness.
Join the discussion

by joseph32 » Sun May 15, 2016 9:24 pm
Answer A seems to be logical one out of other answer choices
Join the discussion