BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Higher Quantitative Score by Missing Early Questions

Problem Solving — algebra and arithmetic (GMAT Focus Edition)
Expert replies
by cbears2010 » Tue Feb 07, 2012 1:27 am
Hi all,

Thanks in advance for your help!

I hope I don't sound ridiculous, but I came up with an interesting observation after completing three practice exams from Manhattan GMAT.

Exam #1: Q(50, 95%), V(45, 99%), Total: 770
Exam #2: Q(48, 86%), V(41, 93%), Total: 730
Exam #3: Q(51, 99%), V(45, 99%), Total: 780

I noticed that while my first two exams averaged 31 questions each with 700-800 difficulty, my third exam consisted of only 8 questions with 700-800 difficulty (I missed two questions early on, and so the difficulty of all subsequent questions was much easier).

Thus, I was hoping you could tell me if missing questions early on in the Quantitative section could potentially be a strategy for attaining a higher overall math score (via easier questions).

Thanks again for your help, and I look forward to hearing back from you!
Join the discussion
Source: — Quantitative Reasoning |

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Tue Feb 07, 2012 3:48 pm
cbears2010 wrote:Hi all,

Thanks in advance for your help!

I hope I don't sound ridiculous, but I came up with an interesting observation after completing three practice exams from Manhattan GMAT.

Exam #1: Q(50, 95%), V(45, 99%), Total: 770
Exam #2: Q(48, 86%), V(41, 93%), Total: 730
Exam #3: Q(51, 99%), V(45, 99%), Total: 780

I noticed that while my first two exams averaged 31 questions each with 700-800 difficulty, my third exam consisted of only 8 questions with 700-800 difficulty (I missed two questions early on, and so the difficulty of all subsequent questions was much easier).

Thus, I was hoping you could tell me if missing questions early on in the Quantitative section could potentially be a strategy for attaining a higher overall math score (via easier questions).

Thanks again for your help, and I look forward to hearing back from you!

I'll begin by saying that the MGMAT tests, although great, do not contain official GMAT questions, and they don't use the official GMAT scoring algorithm, so it's hard to make any conclusions about the official GMAT scoring algorithm. However, I'd stay clear of any strategy that involves intentionally submitting incorrect answers :-)
That said, I can't say that with 100% certainty.

Ian Stewart has spent years dissecting the GMAT scoring algorithm, and he has made several posts on that subject. If I were you, I'd see what he has to say on the matter.

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by cbears2010 » Tue Feb 07, 2012 4:46 pm
Brent,

Thanks a lot for your valuable insight. I've reached out to Ian Stewart, and look forward to speaking with him on the matter.

Cheers,

Justin
Join the discussion