Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

High School Students

Expert replies
by goelmohit2002 » Sat Sep 26, 2009 4:53 am
Hi All,

[spoiler]In the following powerscore CR bible question OA = A. Can someone please tell why not D ?[/spoiler]

======================================================================
High school students who feel that they are not succeeding in high school often drop out before graduating and go to work. Last year, however, the city's high school dropout rate was significantly lower than the previous year's rate. This is encouraging evidence that the program instituted two years ago to improve the morale of high school students has begun to take effect to reduce dropouts.

Which one of the following if true about the last year, most seriously weakens the argument ?

a) There was a recession that caused a high level of unemployment in the city.
b) The morale of students who dropped out of high school had been low even before they reached high school.
c) As in the preceding year, more high school students remained in school than dropped out.
d) High schools in the city established placement offices to assist their graduates in obtaining employment.
e) The antidropout program was primarily aimed at improving students' morale in those high schools with the highest dropout rates.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by kyabe » Sat Sep 26, 2009 6:23 am
D says that officials are helping graduates. But in the argument we are concerned about dropouts. Dropouts have not become graduates yet..

Hope that helps..
Join the discussion

by goelmohit2002 » Sat Sep 26, 2009 6:34 am
kyabe wrote:D says that officials are helping graduates. But in the argument we are concerned about dropouts. Dropouts have not become graduates yet..

Hope that helps..
Let's say I am a high school student(just like any B-school one). If I see that school is making efforts to make sure that students are placed...they wouldn't I drop my idea of leaving the school in between....

In that case it will weaken.

Kindly tell what is the flaw in the above school of thought.
Join the discussion

by hitmewithgmat » Sat Sep 26, 2009 4:03 pm
High school students who feel that they are not succeeding in high school often drop out before graduating and go to work. Last year, however, the city's high school dropout rate was significantly lower than the previous year's rate. This is encouraging evidence that the program instituted two years ago to improve the morale of high school students has begun to take effect to reduce dropouts.

Which one of the following if true about the last year, most seriously weakens the argument ?

Find the other possibilities besides the program. That might explain the dropout, not because of the program that school institutes.

a) There was a recession that caused a high level of unemployment in the city. Yes, because of unemployment rate, high school students remain in school, not drop out. This weakens the argument.

b) The morale of students who dropped out of high school had been low even before they reached high school.
This seems strengthen the argument.
c) As in the preceding year, more high school students remained in school than dropped out.
this is no bearing.

d) High schools in the city established placement offices to assist their graduates in obtaining employment. graduates? we are talking about current students.out of scope.

e) The antidropout program was primarily aimed at improving students' morale in those high schools with the highest dropout rates.This seems to streghten the argument.
Disclaimer-I am not a GMAT savvy yet, but I am learning everyday with my fellow beatthegmat citizens.

I AM DETERMINED TO CRASH/NIX OUT/ATTACK BRUTALLY/CRACK VERBAL PART OF GMAT. ROAR!
Join the discussion

by akhpad » Sat Jun 19, 2010 12:35 am
I agree that A is correct.

D is wring because they are not talking about their graduates. They are talking High school students.

I could not understood that why E is wrong? what could be the explanation?
Join the discussion

by selango » Sat Jun 19, 2010 1:01 am
akhp77,

I think you have doubt bcoz option E indicates that the program primarily focused only on school with high dropout rates.

The question asks you to weaken the argument.
Reduction of dropout -->based on program to improve the morale of students.

But option E does not weaken the argument;it supports the argument.
If its true the program will be instituted only in school where dropout is high,so that dropout can be considerably reduced.
Join the discussion