BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Herbicides allow cereal crops to be grown very efficiently,

Expert replies
by rakeshd347 » Tue Oct 08, 2013 12:50 am
Herbicides allow cereal crops to be grown very efficiently, with virtually no competition from weeds. In Britain, partridge populations have been steadily decreasing since herbicide use became widespread. Some environmentalists claim that these birds, which live in and around cereal crop fields, are being poisoned by the herbicides. However, tests show no more than trace quantities of herbicides in partridges on herbicide-treated land. Therefore, something other than herbicide use must be responsible for the population decrease.

Which of the following, if true about Britain, most seriously weakens the argument?
A. The elimination of certain weeds from cereal crop fields has reduced the population of the small insects that live
on those weeds and that form a major part of partridge chicks' diet.
B. Since partridges are valued as game birds, records of their population are more carefully kept than those for
many other birds.
C. Some of the weeds that are eliminated from cereal crop fields by herbicides are much smaller than the crop
plants themselves and would have no negative effect on crop yield if they were allowed to grow.
D. Birds other than partridges that live in or around cereal crop fields have also been suffering population declines.
E. The toxins contained in herbicides typically used on cereal crops can be readily identified in the tissues of
animals that have ingested them.

OA is A
Last edited by rakeshd347 on Tue Oct 08, 2013 1:33 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by theCodeToGMAT » Tue Oct 08, 2013 1:09 am
According to me [spoiler]{A}[/spoiler].... better of all other choices
R A H U L
Join the discussion

by vinay1983 » Tue Oct 08, 2013 1:10 am
I go with C
You can, for example never foretell what any one man will do, but you can say with precision what an average number will be up to!
Join the discussion

by mevicks » Tue Oct 08, 2013 1:27 am
rakeshd347 wrote:Herbicides allow cereal crops to be grown very efficiently, with virtually no competition from weeds. In Britain, partridge populations have been steadily decreasing since herbicide use became widespread. Some environmentalists claim that these birds, which live in and around cereal crop fields, are being poisoned by the herbicides. However, tests show no more than trace quantities of herbicides in partridges on herbicide-treated land. Therefore, something other than herbicide use must be responsible for the population decrease.

Which of the following, if true about Britain, most seriously weakens the argument?

A. The elimination of certain weeds from cereal crop fields has reduced the population of the small insects that live on those weeds and that form a major part of partridge chicks' diet.
Herbs. destroy certain weeds and which in turn reduces the primary source of nutrition of the small insects and thus they die. Eventually the bird population also decreases as the young ones dont have enough small insects to eat. Strong contender

B. Since partridges are valued as game birds, records of their population are more carefully kept than those for many other birds.
Out of scope: Does not talk about Herbs.

C. Some of the weeds that are eliminated from cereal crop fields by herbicides are much smaller than the crop plants themselves and would have no negative effect on crop yield if they were allowed to grow.
Presents no correlation between the birds and herbs.

D. Birds other than partridges that live in or around cereal crop fields have also been suffering population declines.
Provides no reason for the decline.

E. The toxins contained in herbicides typically used on cereal crops can be readily identified in the tissues of animals that have ingested them.
This provides additional premise that Herb. traces can indeed be detected.
Mapping:
Herbicides --> Good for crops, Bad for Birds (Patridge)
Causation-correlation --> herbicides use became widespread, at the same time bird population declines.
Thus acc. to environmentalists = Herb. is the cause.
BUT tests say otherwise
THUS something other than herbicide use must be responsible for the population decrease

Conclusion: Herb. is not responsible for the population decrease.

We have to weaken this claim, i.e prove that Herb. IS RESPONSIBLE for the decline.

Between A and E, answer seems to be A as it provides additional evidence.


Regards,
Vivek
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Thu Oct 17, 2013 10:05 pm
Herbicide reduce weeds and in turn partridge population.

Conclusion: Something other than herbicide use must be responsible for the population decrease.

Answer A: Suggests that probably decrease in weeds caused decrease in partridge population.


Vikas
Join the discussion

by cd86 » Thu Oct 17, 2013 11:02 pm
The answer is A according to me.

A. The elimination of certain weeds from cereal crop fields has reduced the population of the small insects that live on those weeds and that form a major part of partridge chicks' diet.

B. Since partridges are valued as game birds, records of their population are more carefully kept than those formany other birds. Irrelevant why record of thier population is kept as it does nothing to prove the fact that herbicides might be the cause.

C. Some of the weeds that are eliminated from cereal crop fields by herbicides are much smaller than the crop plants themselves and would have no negative effect on crop yield if they were allowed to grow. Irrelavant to talk about why the weeds are not harmful, as it is nothing to do with herbicides

D. Birds other than partridges that live in or around cereal crop fields have also been suffering population declines. Saying that other birds are also dying does nothing to the arguement

E. The toxins contained in herbicides typically used on cereal crops can be readily identified in the tissues of
animals that have ingested them. Lets say the toxins have been identified, so how does it prove that the death was caused by these toxins only? even human ingest toxins everyday , that might or might not be the reason for any causality,still an irrelevant point
Join the discussion

by Katy_ » Tue Sep 30, 2014 10:26 am
rakeshd347 wrote:Herbicides allow cereal crops to be grown very efficiently, with virtually no competition from weeds. In Britain, partridge populations have been steadily decreasing since herbicide use became widespread. Some environmentalists claim that these birds, which live in and around cereal crop fields, are being poisoned by the herbicides. However, tests show no more than trace quantities of herbicides in partridges on herbicide-treated land. Therefore, something other than herbicide use must be responsible for the population decrease.

Which of the following, if true about Britain, most seriously weakens the argument?
A. The elimination of certain weeds from cereal crop fields has reduced the population of the small insects that live
on those weeds and that form a major part of partridge chicks' diet.
B. Since partridges are valued as game birds, records of their population are more carefully kept than those for
many other birds.
C. Some of the weeds that are eliminated from cereal crop fields by herbicides are much smaller than the crop
plants themselves and would have no negative effect on crop yield if they were allowed to grow.
D. Birds other than partridges that live in or around cereal crop fields have also been suffering population declines.
E. The toxins contained in herbicides typically used on cereal crops can be readily identified in the tissues of
animals that have ingested them.

OA is A
.

I think the answer depends on what we think the "sth other than herbicide" is really is.

A is correct because the indirect reason it states is regarded as "sth other than herbicide".
Join the discussion