BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Help with this reasoning

Expert replies
by capnx » Mon Oct 26, 2009 3:26 pm
Advertisement:
The world's best coffee beans come from Colombia.
The more Colombian beans in a blend of coffee, the
better the blend, and no company purchases more
Colombian beans than Kreemo Coffee, Inc. So it only
stands to reason that if you buy a can of Kreemo's
coffee, you're buying the best blended coffee available today.

The reasoning of the argument in the advertisement is
flawed because it overlooks the possibility that

(A) the equipment used by Kreemo to blend and
package its coffee is no different from that used
by most other coffee producers

(B) not all of Kreemo's competitors use Colombian
coffee beans in the blends of coffee they sell

(C) Kreemo sells more coffee than does any other company

(D) Kreemo's coffee is the most expensive blended
coffee available today

(E) the best unblended coffee is better than the best
blended coffee

[spoiler]OA is C, but why? I chose E[/spoiler]

Question is from GMAT disclosed test No31
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by pandeyvineet24 » Mon Oct 26, 2009 4:24 pm
hi capnx,

i think E is out of scope because the argument only talks about the best blended coffee. Unblended coffee is out of scope.

C is the flaw, coz, the fact that Kreemo sells more coffee than any other company is probably the reason, it purchases more coffee than any others.
Join the discussion

by capnx » Mon Oct 26, 2009 6:21 pm
pandeyvineet24 wrote:hi capnx,

i think E is out of scope because the argument only talks about the best blended coffee. Unblended coffee is out of scope.

C is the flaw, coz, the fact that Kreemo sells more coffee than any other company is probably the reason, it purchases more coffee than any others.
oh I see. the claim is it purchases more coffee than any other stores. gotcha. thanks
Join the discussion

tough

by kiennguyen » Tue Oct 27, 2009 8:02 pm
pandeyvineet24!

this is a good question but i have a hard time to understand. can you please explain it more clearly to me?!!?
Join the discussion

Re: tough

by pandeyvineet24 » Tue Oct 27, 2009 8:22 pm
kiennguyen wrote:pandeyvineet24!

this is a good question but i have a hard time to understand. can you please explain it more clearly to me?!!?
hi kiennguyen
break the argument to see the conclusion and the supporting premises.

conclusion of the argument:
if you buy a can of Kreemo's coffee, you're buying the best blended coffee available today

Premises
(1) The world's best coffee beans come from Colombia.

(2) The more Colombian beans in a blend of coffee, the
better the blend

(3) no company purchases more Colombian beans than Kreemo Coffee, Inc.

therefore the argument has an inherent assumption that because kreemo purchases more coffee than any other company, the cans it makes have a higher blend of Columbian beens.
However,if Kreemo sells more coffee than any other company, then it manufacturers more coffee than any other company. Hence the extra Columbian beens don't increase the blend of individual cans of Coffee, but they increase the Number of Cans, which is what is stated in C.
i hope i made myself clear.
Join the discussion

got it!

by kiennguyen » Tue Oct 27, 2009 11:09 pm
appreciate your kindness! i got it now!

it is very true that if "Kreemo sells more coffee than does any other company", the proportion of Columbia coffee in a single can which it sells may not be higher than that of other companies.
Join the discussion

by dare2dream » Wed Oct 28, 2009 10:16 pm
IMO C.
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Sat Nov 07, 2009 3:59 am
Guys, can someone post a detailed explanation stating why C is the best option.
Join the discussion

by Testluv » Sat Nov 07, 2009 5:47 pm
gmatmachoman wrote:Guys, can someone post a detailed explanation stating why C is the best option.
But gmatmachoman, vineet and kiennguyen's interchange was excellent.

Let me know if there is something specific bothering you here.
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
Join the discussion

by james33 » Sun May 15, 2016 10:17 pm
Looking at it now, C makes sense
Join the discussion