BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

help

Expert replies
by sana.noor » Mon Aug 05, 2013 11:53 pm
What is the probability that a 3-digit positive integer picked at random will have one or more "7" in its digits?
(A) 271/900
(B) 27/100
(C) 7/25
(D) 1/9
(E) 1/10

OA is C
Last edited by sana.noor on Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:40 am, edited 1 time in total.
Work hard in Silence, Let Success make the noise.

If you found my Post really helpful, then don't forget to click the Thank/follow me button. :)
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by lunarpower » Tue Aug 06, 2013 12:37 am
well, the opposite of "one or more 7's" is "no 7"s. do you know how to find the probability of that?
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Join the discussion

by macattack » Tue Aug 06, 2013 1:05 am
Experts please what is wrong with this reasonning:
Total number of 3 digit numbers = 999-100+1=900
Desired outcome: 107,117,127,137...
Total number of desired outcome=252
252/900= 7/25
Join the discussion

by sana.noor » Tue Aug 06, 2013 1:42 am
yes Ron i Know
Probability of getting one or more 7 = 1- (probability of No 7's)
Thankyou i got it
Work hard in Silence, Let Success make the noise.

If you found my Post really helpful, then don't forget to click the Thank/follow me button. :)
Join the discussion

by lunarpower » Tue Aug 06, 2013 1:56 am
[---]
Last edited by lunarpower on Tue Aug 06, 2013 3:34 am, edited 1 time in total.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Join the discussion

by macattack » Tue Aug 06, 2013 3:15 am
100s: 19 desired outcome (107,127,137,147,157,167,170,171,172...)
200s: 19 desired outcome
300s: 19 desired outcome
400s: 19 desired outcome
500s: 19 desired outcome
600s: 19 desired outcome
800s: 19 desired outcome
900s: 19 desired outcome

700s: 100 desired outocme

Total number of desired outcome= 100+19*8=252
Join the discussion

by lunarpower » Tue Aug 06, 2013 3:42 am
macattack -- yeah, you're right here. nice work.

as usual, i misread the problem (yay! dyslexia is fun) as "three-digit code" instead of "three-digit number". so, in other words, i was thinking about 000-999 instead of 100-999.

so, yes, that works.

using the "opposite situation" method:
the chance of getting NO sevens is
(8/9)(9/10)(9/10)
= (8/10)(9/10)
= 72/100
= 18/25

so, the chance of getting at least one seven is 1 - 18/25 = 7/25.

--

you can also do this:
* 90 numbers with "7" in the units place (107, 117, ..., 997); 90 numbers with "7" in the tens place (170, 171, ..., 979), and 100 numbers with "7" in the hundreds place (700-799) ... so, 280.
BUT
* we've counted all the _77 numbers except 777 (eight of them) twice. there are eight of those, so subtract 8.
* we've counted all the 7_7 numbers except 777 (nine of them) twice. there are nine of those, so subtract 9.
* we've counted all the 77_ numbers except 777 (nine of them) twice. there are nine of those, so subtract 9.
so, right now, 254.
FINALLY
* we've counted 777 three times. so, subtract two of them (so that one still counts), leaving 252.

... but your way of counting seems to be more straightforward.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Join the discussion

by macattack » Tue Aug 06, 2013 3:46 am
So the OA is wrong? Hah I am starting to enjoy that whole GMAT ride!
Join the discussion

by lunarpower » Tue Aug 06, 2013 3:47 am
macattack wrote:So the OA is wrong? Hah I am starting to enjoy that whole GMAT ride!
Ya, if the "oa" doesn't say 7/25, then it's wrong.

What does it say?
I'm posting from a tablet, so I can't see behind the cursed blackout thingy.

This is why you should stick with problems from known sources, folks.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Join the discussion

by macattack » Tue Aug 06, 2013 3:55 am
its says 271/900
Join the discussion

by lunarpower » Tue Aug 06, 2013 4:00 am
macattack wrote:its says 271/900
final score...
you: 1
"oa": 0

what's the source?
regard with suspicion from now on...
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Join the discussion

by sana.noor » Tue Aug 06, 2013 6:46 am
Ahhh thank you for telling me that the Official answer posted is wrong. i was trying this question since last many hours but couldnt find that how the author reach at 271/900.

Source: initially i took this from BTG Library but later i found that this question was from gmat club tests.
Work hard in Silence, Let Success make the noise.

If you found my Post really helpful, then don't forget to click the Thank/follow me button. :)
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Tue Aug 06, 2013 11:09 am
Hi All,

The error in the "correct answer" is that the author of this question considers 3-digit numbers that begin with 0.

For example, this author considers 007 to be one of the 3-digit numbers that has a 7 in it. If you consider those additional terms, you'd find another 19 3-digit numbers with a 7 in them.

eg 007, 072, etc.

Thankfully, the GMAT writers have a rigorous writing, vetting and testing phase, so this type of error rarely ever happens.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image
Join the discussion

by macattack » Tue Aug 06, 2013 10:05 pm
Hi Rich,
I don't think that is the case!
It is true that if 3digit numbers starting with 0 are to be considered that the total number of desired outcomes would become 271 like stated in the correct answer. However the denominator would change to 1000 instead of the proposed 900. So if what you are saying is true the correct answer should be 271/1000 and not 271/900.
Regards
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Wed Aug 07, 2013 12:23 am
HI macattack,

You are correct; the denominator WOULD change. So there are TWO errors in this question (the one I pointed out and the one you pointed out).

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image
Join the discussion