m hell confused a to why many ppl r suggesting C???
is B a trap??
BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course
Redeem
Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand
Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.
- 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
- 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
- 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
- 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
- 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
- TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
- 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
- OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
- Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
- MBA Admissions Consulting now available
- 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
- 200,000+ students served
- 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★
5.0
(559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start
then $127/mo
help!
Source: Beat The GMAT — Data Sufficiency |
Let's rephrase the question as Is sqrt(x) + 5 - 2.5x < 0mehaksal wrote:if x is a positive integer, is sqrt{x} < 2.5x - 5 ?
1. x < 3
2. x is a prime number
Given: x is a positive integer.
1. x < 3
Since x is a positive integer, x can either be 1 or 2.
For x=1, sqrt(1) + 5 -2.5 > 0
For x=2, sqrt(2) + 5 -2.5*2 > 0.
In both cases, the expression is > 0, sufficient.
2. x is a prime number.
We already tested for 2 above and got >0, let's test a larger number.
For x=3, sqrt(3) + 5 -2.5*3 = 1.732 + 5 - 7.5 <0. Hence we get opposite sign for x = 3. Insufficient.
A is correct.
Let me know if this helps
Hey eagleeye,eagleeye wrote:Let's rephrase the question as Is sqrt(x) + 5 - 2.5x < 0mehaksal wrote:if x is a positive integer, is sqrt{x} < 2.5x - 5 ?
1. x < 3
2. x is a prime number
Given: x is a positive integer.
1. x < 3
Since x is a positive integer, x can either be 1 or 2.
For x=1, sqrt(1) + 5 -2.5 > 0
For x=2, sqrt(2) + 5 -2.5*2 > 0.
In both cases, the expression is > 0, sufficient.
2. x is a prime number.
We already tested for 2 above and got >0, let's test a larger number.
For x=3, sqrt(3) + 5 -2.5*3 = 1.732 + 5 - 7.5 <0. Hence we get opposite sign for x = 3. Insufficient.
A is correct.
Let me know if this helps
Here, we are only given that X is a positivenumber. How can you say that Squareroot(x) is also positive??
Since x is a positive integer, x can either be 1 or 2.
For x=1, sqrt(1) + 5 -2.5 => -1 +2.5 or 1+ 2.5 ==> always>0
For x=2, sqrt(2) + 5 -2.5*2 , -1.71 + 0 or 1.71 + 0, So its not always 0.
In both cases, the expression is > 0, is NOT sufficient.
2. even two is not sufficient
So, i feel the answer is E.
Correct me if I m wrong.
My assumption was that on the GMAT sqrt of a certain number is always positive. We do not take the negative number.
My rationale:
x^2 = 16,
if we were to square root it, then sqrt (x^2) = mod x = 4, -4
If we were saying x = sqrt (16), then the number is only positive 4
Hence A should be sufficient.
Regards
Anup
My rationale:
x^2 = 16,
if we were to square root it, then sqrt (x^2) = mod x = 4, -4
If we were saying x = sqrt (16), then the number is only positive 4
Hence A should be sufficient.
Regards
Anup
Absolutely.anuprajan5 wrote:My assumption was that on the GMAT sqrt of a certain number is always positive. We do not take the negative number.
Example: sqrt(49) = 7 (not -7)
However, the equation x^2 = 49 has two solutions (x=7, -7)
Cheers,
Brent
Please read this post. It might help. sqrt(x) is never negative for a real number.mehulsayani wrote: Hey eagleeye,
Here, we are only given that X is a positivenumber. How can you say that Squareroot(x) is also positive??
Correct me if I m wrong.
https://www.beatthegmat.com/squares-squa ... tml#476551

















