BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Help me

Expert replies
by ricaototti » Thu Sep 04, 2008 8:27 pm
OA is C but I think it should be E

Is n < 1 ?
(1) nx – n < 0
(2) x–1 = –2


So x= minus 1. Then plug in (1) and we have -2n<0 . N can be =1.1 and it doesnt work.
or
N can be = 0.5 and works.

Shouldnt it be E or am I making a mistake somewhere?

Thanks
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Re: Help me

by parallel_chase » Fri Sep 05, 2008 2:55 am
ricaototti wrote:OA is C but I think it should be E

Is n < 1 ?
(1) nx – n < 0
(2) x–1 = –2


So x= minus 1. Then plug in (1) and we have -2n<0 . N can be =1.1 and it doesnt work.
or
N can be = 0.5 and works.

Shouldnt it be E or am I making a mistake somewhere?
Statement I

nx-n < 0
n(x-1) < 0

We dont know anything about x or n. Therefore insufficient.

Statement II

x-1 = -2

we dont know anything about n. Insufficient.

Combining I & II

n(x-1) < 0

x-1 =-2

-2n < 0

n has to be greater than 0 to satisfy the above equation.

Therefore, n could be greater than 1 & n could be less than 1

Insufficient.

Hence E is the answer.

OA cant be C. unless you are missing something from the question stem.

Whats the source ?
Join the discussion

by mayur00 » Fri Sep 05, 2008 8:47 am
If OA is C then there must be a statement saying "n is an integer" or something similar. Please make sure you're not missing that.
Join the discussion