BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

HELP: lower quantitive score after studying verbal section

Share feedback about this free GMAT prep guide
Expert replies
by sputnik93 » Sat Feb 18, 2012 10:21 am
Okay, so this is really weird:
As I started the 60-Day SG, I took the first GmatPrep Test and scored a 590 (Q41 V28). After studying all the quantitive stuff I took it again and got a 640 (Q49 V28). I was quite happy because I saw that I actually improved my maths and since I didn't study for the verbal section yet, I was fine with the score remaining that low. But now I just took the GmatPrep Test for the third time after studying all that verbal stuff and scored a 620 (Q42 V34) I am not that happy anymore.
I mean, on one hand it is nice to see that I improved my verbal skills but I hate to see my quantitive score going down that much.
Is this normal?
I need to score a 680 and have one month left (I have my test scheduled for St. Patrick's Day)
Join the discussion
Source: — The 60-Day GMAT Study Guide |

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Sat Feb 18, 2012 10:29 am
sputnik93 wrote:Okay, so this is really weird:
As I started the 60-Day SG, I took the first GmatPrep Test and scored a 590 (Q41 V28). After studying all the quantitive stuff I took it again and got a 640 (Q49 V28). I was quite happy because I saw that I actually improved my maths and since I didn't study for the verbal section yet, I was fine with the score remaining that low. But now I just took the GmatPrep Test for the third time after studying all that verbal stuff and scored a 620 (Q42 V34) I am not that happy anymore.
I mean, on one hand it is nice to see that I improved my verbal skills but I hate to see my quantitive score going down that much.
Is this normal?
I need to score a 680 and have one month left (I have my test scheduled for St. Patrick's Day)
It sounds like your quant skills got a little rusty while you were working on verbal. That seems pretty normal to me.
Now that you've studied both math and verbal, you can spend the upcoming month working on any areas of weakness. As you do this, try to keep involved in both areas of the test. So for example, if you decide to spend an evening strengthening your Geometry skills, be sure to practice a few Verbal questions once in a while as well.

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by sputnik93 » Sun Feb 19, 2012 9:10 am
Brent@GMATPrepNow wrote:
sputnik93 wrote:Okay, so this is really weird:
As I started the 60-Day SG, I took the first GmatPrep Test and scored a 590 (Q41 V28). After studying all the quantitive stuff I took it again and got a 640 (Q49 V28). I was quite happy because I saw that I actually improved my maths and since I didn't study for the verbal section yet, I was fine with the score remaining that low. But now I just took the GmatPrep Test for the third time after studying all that verbal stuff and scored a 620 (Q42 V34) I am not that happy anymore.
I mean, on one hand it is nice to see that I improved my verbal skills but I hate to see my quantitive score going down that much.
Is this normal?
I need to score a 680 and have one month left (I have my test scheduled for St. Patrick's Day)
It sounds like your quant skills got a little rusty while you were working on verbal. That seems pretty normal to me.
Now that you've studied both math and verbal, you can spend the upcoming month working on any areas of weakness. As you do this, try to keep involved in both areas of the test. So for example, if you decide to spend an evening strengthening your Geometry skills, be sure to practice a few Verbal questions once in a while as well.

Cheers,
Brent
That's what I thought...
But will it come back as I continue to work on the last 20 days of my 60-Day SG, or do I have to look over all the concepts in the Original Review and the Kaplan GMAT Premier again?
The thing is: if I had both scores combined, I'd be totally happy because a Q49 V34 is probably a 680 or 690 which is exactly what I'm going for....
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Sun Feb 19, 2012 9:15 am
sputnik93 wrote: That's what I thought...
But will it come back as I continue to work on the last 20 days of my 60-Day SG, or do I have to look over all the concepts in the Original Review and the Kaplan GMAT Premier again?
The thing is: if I had both scores combined, I'd be totally happy because a Q49 V34 is probably a 680 or 690 which is exactly what I'm going for....
I really can't say whether or not it will come back. . . . that really depends on you.
That said, I doubt that you'll need to review every concept. I imagine that there will be areas that require some reviewing and these areas will become evident as you take practice tests.

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion